qgApproachCount
plain-language theorem explainer
The theorem asserts that the inductive enumeration of quantum gravity approaches in Recognition Science has cardinality five. Researchers comparing the framework to loop quantum gravity or causal dynamical triangulations would cite this count to confirm the subsumption of standard approaches. The proof is a direct decision on the Fintype instance automatically derived from the five-constructor inductive type.
Claim. The finite type consisting of the five quantum gravity approaches (canonical quantum gravity, spin foam, causal sets, causal dynamical triangulations, and loop quantum gravity) has cardinality exactly 5.
background
The module Quantum Gravity from RS supplies structural backing for the Planck-scale bounce radius r_min(N) = ℓ_Planck × φ^(N/2) together with positivity and monotonicity properties of echo delays. It enumerates five canonical approaches that the Recognition Science framework is claimed to subsume under a configuration dimension of 5. Upstream rung definitions from masses, nuclear bridges, and cellular automata supply the discrete ladder structure on which the bounce radius and related quantities are defined.
proof idea
The proof is a one-line term that applies the decide tactic to the equality Fintype.card QGApproach = 5, using the Fintype instance derived from the inductive definition of QGApproach.
why it matters
This supplies the five_approaches component of the quantumGravityCert definition, completing the structural certification that Recognition Science incorporates the listed quantum gravity approaches. It aligns with the module claim that configDim D = 5 and connects to the broader forcing chain landmarks (T5 J-uniqueness through T8 D = 3). It touches the open question of whether further approaches exist outside the enumerated set.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.