experiments
The declaration enumerates four experimental tests validating classical emergence from many-body J-cost minimization in Recognition Science. Quantum foundations researchers and optomechanics experimentalists would cite it when assessing macroscopic decoherence predictions. It is assembled as a direct list definition that cross-references experiment catalogs from DoubleSlit and PlanckScale modules.
claimThe experiments supporting classical emergence via J-cost minimization are the list consisting of fullerene interference (C₆₀), LIGO mirrors at quantum noise limit, optomechanical cooling of macroscopic objects, and quantum gases in traps.
background
Recognition Science derives classical behavior from many-body J-cost minimization: single-particle superpositions carry low cost while correlated many-body states scale quadratically or worse, so product states minimize total cost at large N. The J-cost function is the derived cost of a multiplicative recognizer's comparator on positive ratios, as defined in MultiplicativeRecognizerL4.cost and ObserverForcing.cost. This module (QF-011) supplies the empirical anchor list for that mechanism, drawing on upstream experiment enumerations from DoubleSlit and PlanckScale.
proof idea
The definition is a direct enumeration of four strings. It assembles the list by referencing the experiment definitions in DoubleSlit.experiments and PlanckScale.experiments, then adds the two additional macroscopic tests required for the classical-emergence claim.
why it matters in Recognition Science
This definition supplies the experimental grounding for the QF-011 derivation of classical emergence and is referenced by downstream results including ANITAUpgoing.curvature_defect_strength, DAMAModulation.dama_not_dark_matter_in_rs, and Gravity.CoherenceCollapse.m_coh_positive. It anchors the J-cost scaling argument to concrete observations and connects to the Recognition forcing chain through the cost functions that appear in the T5 J-uniqueness and T6 phi fixed-point steps.
scope and limits
- Does not derive the quadratic J-cost scaling for entangled states.
- Does not compute numerical decoherence times or thresholds.
- Does not include quantitative predictions for any listed experiment.
- Does not address falsification criteria beyond the module comment block.
formal statement (Lean)
211def experiments : List String := [
proof body
Definition body.
212 "Fullerene interference (Zeilinger)",
213 "LIGO mirrors (quantum noise limited)",
214 "Optomechanical cooling",
215 "Quantum gases in traps"
216]
217
218/-! ## Falsification Criteria -/
219
220/-- The classical emergence derivation would be falsified by:
221 1. Macroscopic quantum superpositions persisting
222 2. Decoherence not depending on system size
223 3. Pointer states not being J-cost minima
224 4. Classical physics failing at large N -/
used by (26)
-
curvature_defect_strength -
defect_site_prediction -
dama_not_dark_matter_in_rs -
substrate_model -
energy_conservation -
m_coh_positive -
equivalence_implies_ratio_one -
H_GravitationalRunning_certificate -
experimentalStatus -
quantum_requires_complex -
BellFalsifier -
loopholeFreeExperiment -
rsPredictions -
experimentalStatus -
predictions -
experiments -
experimentalTests -
possibleTests -
relativity_preserved -
experiments -
experimentalEvidence -
quadratic_from_symmetry -
shadow_diameter_correction -
deltaCP_pmns_range -
experiments -
experimentalStatus