FirewallFalsifier
plain-language theorem explainer
FirewallFalsifier packages the three conditions that would invalidate the Recognition Science resolution of the black hole firewall paradox. A quantum-gravity researcher would cite it when testing consistency between the non-local ledger and the AMPS trilemma. The structure simply declares the relevant propositions and asserts that detection of a firewall or loss of information cannot occur.
Claim. A falsifier consists of propositions $F$ (firewall detected), $I$ (information lost), $L$ (ledger discontinuous at horizon) together with a proof that $F$ or $I$ is impossible.
background
The Quantum.Firewall module frames the firewall paradox as the AMPS trilemma among unitarity of Hawking radiation, smoothness of the horizon for infalling observers, and locality of physics outside the horizon. Recognition Science resolves the trilemma by making the ledger fundamentally non-local, so that unitarity and horizon smoothness can both hold. The FirewallFalsifier structure records the exact propositions whose joint truth would defeat this ledger-based account.
proof idea
This is a structure definition that directly encodes the three falsifying propositions and the required contradiction on the first two. No lemmas or tactics are invoked; the declaration serves as a packaging of the conditions listed in the module documentation.
why it matters
The definition supplies the precise falsification boundary for the QG-005 resolution of the firewall paradox. It stands alongside sibling declarations such as AMPSTrilemma and Resolution that formalize the trilemma and its ledger treatment. Within the Recognition framework it supports the claim that non-local ledger connections across the horizon preserve information without introducing drama, consistent with the overall forcing chain from T5 onward.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.