possibleTests
plain-language theorem explainer
possibleTests enumerates four indirect experimental probes for the Recognition Science resolution of the black hole firewall paradox. A quantum gravity researcher would cite the list when discussing testable consequences of a non-local ledger that preserves unitarity and horizon smoothness. The definition is a static list of strings drawn directly from the module summary of spectrum deviations, echo absence, analog simulations, and holographic methods.
Claim. The possible indirect tests for the firewall resolution are Hawking spectrum deviations from thermal behavior due to $φ$-structure, absence of gravitational wave echoes from a smooth horizon, laboratory analog black hole experiments, and holographic calculations.
background
Module QG-005 sets the local theoretical setting as the firewall paradox trilemma (unitarity of Hawking radiation, no drama for infalling observers, and locality outside the horizon) and its resolution via a non-local ledger in Recognition Science. The ledger is conserved across the horizon, enabling both information preservation and smoothness while making locality emergent at large scales. Upstream results supply supporting structures such as nuclear density tiers in $φ$-powers and smoothness abbrevs from Aczel proofs, though this definition draws its content from the module's explicit summary of the five-point RS resolution.
proof idea
This is a definition that hardcodes a list of four strings. It functions as a one-line wrapper enumerating the proposed tests without invoking lemmas or tactics.
why it matters
The declaration supports the RS resolution of the firewall paradox by listing empirical checks for the module summary points: unitarity via ledger conservation, no firewall from horizon smoothness, emergent locality, ER=EPR from shared ledger, and Page curve from ledger transfer. It touches the proposed Nature paper on firewall resolution and aligns with framework elements including the non-local ledger and $φ$-structure predictions. No downstream theorems reference it.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.