pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem proved term proof high

consecutive_gap_ratio

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Successive gaps to the asymptotic limit in the athletic record model satisfy a fixed ratio of the inverse golden ratio. Analysts fitting track records to the phi-ladder would cite this to confirm the predicted geometric decay. The term proof rewrites the ratio via the successor lemma then simplifies the field expression after confirming positivity of the gap.

claimLet $g(N)$ denote the gap to the asymptotic record limit at improvement step $N$. Then $g(N+1)/g(N) = phi^{-1}$ for every natural number $N$.

background

The gap function is defined by $g(N) = referenceGap * phi^{-N}$. This module supplies the explicit fitting layer for athletic records, showing that successive improvements decay geometrically by $phi^{-1}$ per step, as already proved structurally for the men's mile and 100 m. The upstream gapAt_succ_ratio in PolarCodeGapFromPhi establishes the identical relation for polar-code gaps, which is mirrored verbatim here.

proof idea

The proof applies the successor ratio theorem to replace the left-hand side, then invokes field_simp using the positivity fact gapAt_pos' N.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This supplies the consecutive_ratio field inside recordProgressionCert, the top-level certificate for athletic-record fits. It implements the geometric decay required by the Recognition Science phi-ladder, consistent with the self-similar fixed point and T5 J-uniqueness. No open scaffolding remains.

scope and limits

formal statement (Lean)

  56theorem consecutive_gap_ratio (N : ℕ) :
  57    gapAt (N + 1) / gapAt N = phi⁻¹ := by

proof body

Term-mode proof.

  58  rw [gapAt_succ_ratio]
  59  field_simp [(gapAt_pos' N).ne']
  60
  61/-- Consecutive gaps are strictly decreasing. -/

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (5)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.