pith. sign in
theorem

etaBExactRungCert

proved
show as:

Baryon asymmetry η_B sits at φ-rung 44.

module
IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.EtaBExactRungDerivation
domain
Cosmology
line
159 · github
papers citing
1 paper (below)

plain-language theorem explainer

Three combinatorial expressions for the baryon-to-photon ratio rung all evaluate to the integer -44 at three spatial dimensions. A cosmologist working in Recognition Science would cite this to anchor the exact φ-ladder position of η_B. The proof is a term-mode construction that supplies the dimension witness, the chirality-torsion witness, the fermionic-DOF witness, and the three pairwise agreement lemmas.

Claim. At spatial dimension three the expressions $1 - D^2(D+2)$, $-(bitFlipCount(0) times |torsionGap(0,1)|)$, and $1 - fermionicDOF/2$ each equal $-44$ and are pairwise equal, where these expressions are the three reparameterizations of the integration gap minus one.

background

Recognition Science fixes the baryon-to-photon ratio η_B on the φ-ladder via the integration gap at D=3. The gap equals D²(D+2)-1 and evaluates to 44 when D=3. The module re-expresses this single integer through three combinatorial routes: the direct dimension formula, the product of bit-flip count on the 3-cube Gray code with the torsion gap from the CW-filtration spectrum, and the fermionic degree-of-freedom count after matter-antimatter doubling. The module doc states these are not independent forcing routes but distinct reparameterizations of the same underlying integer.

proof idea

Term-mode construction of the EtaBExactRungCert structure. It directly references the dimension witness lemma at D=3, the chirality equation lemma, the fermionic equation lemma, the AB and AC agreement lemmas, the BC agreement lemma, the chirality-product bridge lemma, and the fermionic-half bridge lemma.

why it matters

The declaration unifies the three witnesses for the -44 rung of η_B and confirms they all reduce to integrationGap D -1 =44 at D=3. It thereby closes the combinatorial derivation of the exact φ-ladder position required by the eight-tick octave and the forcing of D=3. No downstream theorems are listed, but the result supplies the concrete integer that later mass and coupling formulas on the φ-ladder will use.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.