theorem
proved
phi_pow_fib
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.EtaBPrefactorDerivation on GitHub at line 147.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
formal source
144/-! ## φ^(−44) bounds via the Fibonacci identity -/
145
146/-- `φ^(n+1) = F(n+1) · φ + F(n)`. (Standard Fibonacci-φ identity.) -/
147private theorem phi_pow_fib (n : ℕ) :
148 phi ^ (n + 1) = (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) * phi + (Nat.fib n : ℝ) := by
149 induction n with
150 | zero =>
151 simp only [Nat.fib_zero, Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
152 rw [show Nat.fib 1 = 1 from rfl]; simp
153 | succ n ih =>
154 have hfib : Nat.fib (n + 2) = Nat.fib n + Nat.fib (n + 1) := Nat.fib_add_two
155 calc phi ^ (n + 1 + 1) = phi ^ (n + 1) * phi := by ring
156 _ = ((Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) * phi + (Nat.fib n : ℝ)) * phi := by rw [ih]
157 _ = (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) * phi ^ 2 + (Nat.fib n : ℝ) * phi := by ring
158 _ = (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) * (phi + 1) + (Nat.fib n : ℝ) * phi := by rw [phi_sq_eq]
159 _ = ((Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) + (Nat.fib n : ℝ)) * phi + (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) := by ring
160 _ = (↑(Nat.fib n + Nat.fib (n + 1)) : ℝ) * phi + (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) := by
161 simp only [Nat.cast_add]; ring
162 _ = (Nat.fib (n + 2) : ℝ) * phi + (Nat.fib (n + 1) : ℝ) := by rw [hfib]
163
164theorem phi_pow_44_fib :
165 phi ^ (44 : ℕ) = (701408733 : ℝ) * phi + 433494437 := by
166 have hfib := phi_pow_fib 43
167 have hf44 : Nat.fib 44 = 701408733 := by native_decide
168 have hf43 : Nat.fib 43 = 433494437 := by native_decide
169 simp only [hf44, hf43] at hfib
170 exact hfib
171
172private lemma phi_zpow_neg44_eq_inv : phi ^ (-44 : ℤ) = (phi ^ (44 : ℕ))⁻¹ := by
173 rw [show ((-44 : ℤ)) = -((44 : ℕ) : ℤ) from by norm_num, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
174
175theorem phi_zpow_neg44_lower : phi ^ (-44 : ℤ) > 6.37e-10 := by
176 rw [phi_zpow_neg44_eq_inv]
177 have hupper : phi ^ (44 : ℕ) < 1.5698e9 := by
papers checked against this theorem (showing 1 of 1)
-
Black-hole scalar yields null-state equations for 4D CFTs
"the coefficient of Φ8 is proportional to (Δ + 2)... the pattern is Φ_{2n} : (Δ + n − 2) with n = 3, 4, 5, 6, ..."