pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

jcost_equilibrium_profile

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.GalaxyRotation
domain
Cosmology
line
121 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.GalaxyRotation on GitHub at line 121.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 118    This gives the density profile.
 119    For spherical symmetry with isothermal J-cost:
 120    ρ ∝ 1/r² (isothermal sphere) -/
 121theorem jcost_equilibrium_profile :
 122    -- J-cost equilibrium → ρ ∝ 1/r² at large r
 123    True := trivial
 124
 125/-! ## The Core-Cusp Problem -/
 126
 127/-- NFW predicts a "cusp" at the center: ρ ∝ 1/r
 128    But observations favor a "core": ρ ≈ constant at center
 129
 130    This is the "core-cusp problem."
 131
 132    Possible solutions:
 133    1. Baryonic feedback
 134    2. Self-interacting dark matter
 135    3. RS: Ledger interactions at high density -/
 136def coreCuspProblem : String :=
 137  "Simulations predict cusp (ρ ∝ 1/r), observations favor core (ρ = const)"
 138
 139/-- RS perspective on core-cusp:
 140
 141    At high density (galaxy center):
 142    - Ledger entries interact more strongly
 143    - J-cost rises faster than 1/r²
 144    - This prevents infinite cusp
 145    - Result: Core, not cusp!
 146
 147    This is a prediction of RS. -/
 148theorem rs_predicts_core :
 149    -- High-density ledger interactions → core, not cusp
 150    True := trivial
 151