Pith. sign in
lemma

Jcost_symm

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Cost
domain
Cost
line
22 · github
papers citing
5 papers (below)

plain-language theorem explainer

The lemma shows that J-cost is unchanged when its argument is replaced by its reciprocal for any positive real. Modelers in acoustics, aesthetics, and chemistry cite it to establish symmetry of penalties around unity ratio. The short proof rewrites both sides using the squared form of J-cost and verifies the identity by simplification.

Claim. For every positive real number $x$, $J(x) = J(x^{-1})$, where $J(x) = (x + x^{-1})/2 - 1$.

background

J-cost is defined by the expression $J(x) = (x + x^{-1})/2 - 1$. This is the unique function satisfying the composition law in the Recognition framework. The equivalent squared-ratio form $J(x) = (x-1)^2/(2x)$ for nonzero $x$ is given by the lemma Jcost_eq_sq.

proof idea

The proof derives that $x$ is nonzero from the strict positivity assumption. It substitutes the squared-ratio expression for J-cost on both $x$ and its inverse. Field simplification removes denominators, after which the ring tactic confirms the two sides are identical.

why it matters

This lemma is used in dozens of applications, such as establishing symmetric pleasure in the Berlyne model and reciprocal cost in speech intelligibility. It encodes the double-entry property for ratios, aligning with the J-uniqueness at T5 of the forcing chain. The result closes the algebraic symmetry needed for the eight-tick octave structure.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.