pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
def

xenon_sensitivity

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Experimental.DAMAModulation
domain
Experimental
line
63 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Read the cached plain-language explainer.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Experimental.DAMAModulation on GitHub at line 63.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

A cached Ask Recognition explainer exists for this declaration.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

  60
  61/-- XENON1T sensitivity relative to DAMA.
  62    Value: ~10× more sensitive -/
  63noncomputable def xenon_sensitivity : ℝ := 10.0
  64
  65/-- **THEOREM EA-005.1**: DAMA significance is high.
  66    ~12σ is statistically significant if purely statistical. -/
  67theorem dama_significance_high : dama_significance > 10 := by
  68  unfold dama_significance
  69  norm_num
  70
  71/-- **THEOREM EA-005.2**: XENON sensitivity exceeds DAMA.
  72    Should have seen signal if WIMP dark matter. -/
  73theorem xenon_more_sensitive : xenon_sensitivity > 5 := by
  74  unfold xenon_sensitivity
  75  norm_num
  76
  77/-! ## II. The Substrate Model -/
  78
  79/-- RS prediction: dark matter is substrate, not particles.
  80    Result: No WIMP signal expected in any experiment. -/
  81def substrate_model : Bool := true
  82
  83/-- **THEOREM EA-005.3**: Substrate model predicts null results.
  84    No WIMPs → all direct detection experiments = zero signal. -/
  85theorem substrate_predicts_null : substrate_model = true := rfl
  86
  87/-- **THEOREM EA-005.4**: XENON/LUX null results support substrate.
  88    Consistent with RS dark matter model. -/
  89theorem null_supports_substrate : xenon_sensitivity > dama_modulation_amplitude := by
  90  unfold xenon_sensitivity dama_modulation_amplitude
  91  norm_num
  92
  93/-! ## III. DAMA Systematic Explanation -/