theorem
proved
lt_iff_succ_le
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.ArithmeticFromLogic on GitHub at line 356.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
formal source
353 show succ a + k = succ b
354 rw [succ_add, hk]
355
356theorem lt_iff_succ_le {n m : LogicNat} : n < m ↔ succ n ≤ m := by
357 constructor
358 · rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
359 refine ⟨k, ?_⟩
360 show succ n + k = m
361 rw [succ_add]
362 show succ (n + k) = m
363 rw [← add_succ]
364 -- need n + succ k = m, but we have n + succ k = m via hk; succ_add transforms
365 -- Wait: hk : n + succ k = m, and succ (n + k) = n + succ k by add_succ. So succ (n + k) = m.
366 exact hk
367 · rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
368 refine ⟨k, ?_⟩
369 show n + succ k = m
370 rw [add_succ]
371 show succ (n + k) = m
372 rw [← succ_add]
373 exact hk
374
375theorem lt_irrefl (n : LogicNat) : ¬ n < n := by
376 rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
377 -- n + succ k = n. Apply toNat: toNat n + toNat (succ k) = toNat n on Nat.
378 have := congrArg toNat hk
379 rw [toNat_add, toNat_succ] at this
380 -- this : toNat n + Nat.succ (toNat k) = toNat n
381 omega
382
383theorem lt_trans {a b c : LogicNat} (hab : a < b) (hbc : b < c) : a < c := by
384 rw [lt_iff_succ_le] at hab hbc ⊢
385 exact le_trans hab (le_trans (le_succ b) hbc)
386