linearTwoSimplexMap_face_zero
plain-language theorem explainer
The zeroth face of the lift-affine singular 2-simplex on real lifts (p,q,r) equals the geodesic 1-simplex from q to r. Anyone computing the free singular boundary of that 2-simplex cites this identity. The proof is pointwise: expand both sides on barycentric coordinates, apply the δ₀ face-map coordinate lemmas, and finish by the simplex sum-to-one relation plus ring.
Claim. For all real lifts $p,q,r$, the face $\delta_0$ of the lift-affine singular $2$-simplex on $(p,q,r)$ equals the geodesic singular $1$-simplex from $q$ to $r$ on $S^1$.
background
This module lifts path-level winding/displacement on $S^1$ to singular simplices and proves that displacement kills $2$-boundaries, giving the split-injective half of $H_1(S^1;\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}$.
A singular $2$-simplex is a continuous map $\Delta^2\to S^1$; its $i$-th face is composition with the standard face map $\delta_i:\Delta^1\to\Delta^2$. The geodesic $1$-simplex from lifts $a$ to $b$ is the projection of the straight line $(1-t)a+tb$ through the covering map $\mathbb{R}\to S^1$. The lift-affine $2$-simplex on $(p,q,r)$ is the analogous affine map on barycentric coordinates of $\Delta^2$, then projected to the circle.
On the side face $\delta_0$, the ambient barycentric coordinates satisfy $x_1=u_0$ and $x_2=u_1$ for the domain $\Delta^1$ coordinates $u$ (the two face-map coordinate lemmas used below).
proof idea
Pointwise equality of continuous maps on $\Delta^1$. After ext, both sides simplify via the definitions of face (composition with the face map), the lift-affine $2$-simplex, and the geodesic $1$-simplex. The $\delta_0$ coordinate lemmas replace the ambient $x_1,x_2$ by the domain barycentric coordinates. The standard-simplex identity $u_0+u_1=1$ rewrites $u_0=1-u_1$, and ring matches the geodesic convex combination $(1-u_1)q+u_1 r$.
why it matters
Feeds the geodesic composition law: the free singular boundary of the lift-affine $2$-simplex on $(p,q,r)$ is $\mathrm{geo}(q,r)-\mathrm{geo}(p,r)+\mathrm{geo}(p,q)$, so geodesics compose additively in $H_1$. That identity is the concrete chain-level witness that geodesic edges behave like a group law up to boundaries, which is the computational engine behind the module's kills-boundaries theorem and the winding left-inverse to the fundamental class on $S^1$.
In the broader Recognition foundation stack this is pure singular-homology scaffolding for the circle (no direct T0–T8 forcing step), but it closes the face bookkeeping needed before winding can be promoted from paths to homology classes.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.