pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
def

RSExists

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.CostFirstExistence
domain
Foundation
line
37 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.CostFirstExistence on GitHub at line 37.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

  34noncomputable section
  35
  36/-- Recognition existence: `x` exists iff J(x) = 0. -/
  37def RSExists (x : ℝ) : Prop := Jcost x = 0
  38
  39/-- RSExists iff x = 1 (the unique J-cost minimiser). -/
  40theorem rsExists_iff_one {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
  41    RSExists x ↔ x = 1 := by
  42  unfold RSExists
  43  constructor
  44  · intro h
  45    by_contra hne
  46    exact absurd h (ne_of_gt (Jcost_pos_of_ne_one x hx hne))
  47  · rintro rfl
  48    exact Jcost_unit0
  49
  50/-- Non-existence costs more than zero. -/
  51theorem non_existence_has_positive_cost {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hne : x ≠ 1) :
  52    0 < Jcost x :=
  53  Jcost_pos_of_ne_one x hx hne
  54
  55/-- The unique "nothing" reference: cost is unbounded on (0,∞). -/
  56theorem divergence_at_zero_direction :
  57    ¬ ∃ (C : ℝ), ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → Jcost ε ≤ C := by
  58  intro ⟨C, hC⟩
  59  -- Pick ε = 1/(2*(|C|+2)); then J(ε) > |C|+1 > C
  60  -- Actual proof: pick ε = 1/4, then J(1/4) = (1/4-1)²/(2·1/4) = (9/16)/(1/2) = 9/8
  61  -- That only bounds J away from C when C < 9/8.
  62  -- For large C, pick ε = 1/(C+2):
  63  -- J(1/(C+2)) = (1/(C+2)-1)²/(2/(C+2)) = (C+1)²/(C+2)²·(C+2)/2 = (C+1)²/(2(C+2))
  64  -- For C ≥ 0: (C+1)²/(2(C+2)) > C ↔ (C+1)² > 2C(C+2) = 2C²+4C ↔ C²+2C+1 > 2C²+4C ↔ 0 > C²+2C-1
  65  -- This fails for C ≥ 1. Need a better choice. Use ε = 1/(2C+4):
  66  -- J(1/(2C+4)) = (1/(2C+4)-1)²/(2/(2C+4)) = ((2C+3)/(2C+4))²·(2C+4)/2 = (2C+3)²/(2(2C+4))
  67  -- Compare with C: (2C+3)²/(2(2C+4)) > C ↔ (2C+3)² > 2C(2C+4) = 4C²+8C