theorem
proved
spinor_dim_D3
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcing on GitHub at line 192.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
Derivations using this theorem
depends on
formal source
189def spinorDimension (D : Dimension) : ℕ := 2^(D / 2)
190
191/-- D = 3 gives 2-component spinors. -/
192theorem spinor_dim_D3 : spinorDimension 3 = 2 := rfl
193
194/-- D = 1 gives 1-component (trivial) spinors. -/
195theorem spinor_dim_D1 : spinorDimension 1 = 1 := rfl
196
197/-- D = 2 gives 2-component spinors (but SO(2) is abelian). -/
198theorem spinor_dim_D2 : spinorDimension 2 = 2 := rfl
199
200/-- D = 4 gives 4-component spinors (chiral structure). -/
201theorem spinor_dim_D4 : spinorDimension 4 = 4 := rfl
202
203/-- A dimension has the RS-required spinor structure if:
204 1. Spinors are 2-component (spin-½ particles)
205 2. Spin(D) is non-abelian (for gauge interactions)
206 3. Spin(D) is simple (not a product)
207
208 **Scope note**: This structure describes D=3 as having the right Clifford/spinor
209 properties (Cl₃ ≅ M₂(ℂ), Spin(3) ≅ SU(2)). It is a *characterization* of why
210 D=3 is physically special, not the derivation. The formal proof that D=3 is
211 forced rests on Alexander duality: the linking group H̃^{D-2}(S¹) = ℤ iff D = 3.
212 The spinor conditions (two_component, nonabelian, simple) and the 8-tick identity
213 (2^D = 8) are derived as *consequences* of D=3, not used as premises. -/
214structure HasRSSpinorStructure (D : Dimension) : Prop where
215 /-- 2-component spinors -/
216 two_component : spinorDimension D = 2 ∨ D = 3
217 /-- Spin(D) is non-abelian — for D=3 this follows from Spin(3)≅SU(2) -/
218 nonabelian : D ≥ 3
219 /-- Spin(D) is simple (D = 3 or D ≥ 5) -/
220 simple : D = 3 ∨ D ≥ 5
221
222/-- D = 3 has the RS spinor structure. -/