structure
definition
SelfRefQuery
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.GodelDissolution on GitHub at line 73.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
formal source
70
71 Formally: c is a SelfRefQuery if there exists a "decoder" function
72 that maps c to the proposition ¬Stabilizes(c). -/
73structure SelfRefQuery where
74 /-- The configuration -/
75 config : ℝ
76 /-- The self-referential property: c encodes "I don't stabilize" -/
77 self_ref : (defect config = 0) ↔ ¬(defect config = 0)
78
79/-- **THEOREM 1**: Self-referential stabilization queries are contradictory.
80
81 If c encodes "c ⟺ ¬Stab(c)", then assuming c has any definite
82 stabilization status leads to contradiction.
83
84 This is the heart of the Gödel dissolution: such c cannot exist
85 as consistent configurations. -/
86theorem self_ref_query_impossible : ¬∃ q : SelfRefQuery, True := by
87 intro ⟨q, _⟩
88 -- q.self_ref says: (defect config = 0) ↔ ¬(defect config = 0)
89 -- This is impossible: P ↔ ¬P has no model
90 have h := q.self_ref
91 -- Assume defect config = 0
92 by_cases hd : defect q.config = 0
93 · -- If defect = 0, then by self_ref, ¬(defect = 0)
94 have : ¬(defect q.config = 0) := h.mp hd
95 contradiction
96 · -- If defect ≠ 0, then by self_ref.symm, defect = 0
97 have : defect q.config = 0 := h.mpr hd
98 contradiction
99
100/-- **COROLLARY**: No consistent configuration can be a self-referential
101 stabilization query. Such "configurations" are syntactically expressible
102 but ontologically empty. -/
103theorem self_ref_not_configuration :