theorem
proved
self_ref_not_configuration
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.GodelDissolution on GitHub at line 103.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
formal source
100/-- **COROLLARY**: No consistent configuration can be a self-referential
101 stabilization query. Such "configurations" are syntactically expressible
102 but ontologically empty. -/
103theorem self_ref_not_configuration :
104 ∀ c : ℝ, ¬((defect c = 0) ↔ ¬(defect c = 0)) := by
105 intro c h
106 by_cases hd : defect c = 0
107 · exact (h.mp hd) hd
108 · exact hd (h.mpr hd)
109
110/-! ## The Extended Analysis: RSTrue, RSFalse, and Outside -/
111
112/-- RS-truth predicate (stabilization). -/
113def RSStab (c : ℝ) : Prop := defect c = 0
114
115/-- RS-falsity predicate (divergence). -/
116def RSDiverge (c : ℝ) : Prop := ∀ C : ℝ, defect c > C
117
118/-- Outside the ontology: neither stabilizes nor diverges. -/
119def RSOutside (c : ℝ) : Prop := ¬RSStab c ∧ ¬RSDiverge c
120
121/-- A more general self-referential query: c encodes "I don't RSStab."
122 We model this as: there's a function φ that tells us "what c asserts"
123 and c asserts ¬RSStab(c). -/
124structure GeneralSelfRefQuery where
125 config : ℝ
126 /-- c "asserts" a proposition -/
127 asserts : Prop
128 /-- That proposition is ¬RSStab(c) -/
129 encodes_negation : asserts ↔ ¬RSStab config
130 /-- c is "correct" if what it asserts matches its stabilization status -/
131 correctness : RSStab config ↔ asserts
132
133/-- **THEOREM 2**: General self-referential queries are contradictory.