pith. sign in
theorem

law_of_existence

proved
show as:

Existence is forced by distinction. The first move of the chain.

module
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence
domain
Foundation
line
80 · github
papers citing
17 papers (below)

plain-language theorem explainer

The biconditional equates the Exists predicate to DefectCollapse for any real x. Foundation researchers cite this when moving between the structure form of existence and the conjunction form of defect collapse. The term proof directly identifies the two predicates by matching their shared positivity and zero-defect components.

Claim. For a real number $x$, $x$ exists if and only if defect collapses, where existence means $0 < x$ and defect$(x) = 0$, and defect collapse is the conjunction $0 < x$ and defect$(x) = 0$.

background

The Law of Existence module supplies a sharp formalization of the statement that $x$ exists precisely when defect$(x) = 0$. The Exists structure packages the two conditions $0 < x$ and defect $x = 0$. DefectCollapse is the definitionally identical conjunction of the same two conditions.

proof idea

The term proof constructs the equivalence by sending the Exists structure constructor to the DefectCollapse pair and back. No lemmas are invoked because the two predicates contain exactly the same data.

why it matters

This equivalence is the second key theorem listed in the module and feeds directly into CostAxioms.law_of_existence (which concludes Exists $x$ iff $x = 1$) and unity_is_unique_existent. It bridges the defect formulation used here to the J-cost minimum at unity that appears in the upstream CostAxioms definition of existence.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.