`RSIndependentTriple`

definition

show as: view math explainer →

module: IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.RSCoupledAxis
domain: Foundation
line: 43 · github
papers citing: none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.RSCoupledAxis on GitHub at line 43.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

  40  A.primitive ≠ B.primitive
  41
  42/-- Pairwise independent triple of same-size axes. -/
  43structure RSIndependentTriple (n : ℕ) where
  44  axis1 : CoupledAxis n
  45  axis2 : CoupledAxis n
  46  axis3 : CoupledAxis n
  47  indep12 : independent axis1 axis2
  48  indep13 : independent axis1 axis3
  49  indep23 : independent axis2 axis3
  50
  51/-- Pairwise independent disjoint sum of same-size axes. -/
  52structure RSDisjointSum3 (n : ℕ) where
  53  axis1 : CoupledAxis n
  54  axis2 : CoupledAxis n
  55  axis3 : CoupledAxis n
  56  indep12 : independent axis1 axis2
  57  indep13 : independent axis1 axis3
  58  indep23 : independent axis2 axis3
  59
  60/-- Product of the cardinalities of three same-size RS-independent axes. -/
  61def tripleProductCard {n : ℕ} (T : RSIndependentTriple n) : ℕ :=
  62  @Fintype.card T.axis1.Ix T.axis1.finite *
  63    @Fintype.card T.axis2.Ix T.axis2.finite *
  64    @Fintype.card T.axis3.Ix T.axis3.finite
  65
  66/-- The tensor-product count of three same-size RS-independent axes is n^3. -/
  67theorem triple_card {n : ℕ} (T : RSIndependentTriple n) :
  68    tripleProductCard T = n * n * n := by
  69  unfold tripleProductCard
  70  rw [T.axis1.card_eq, T.axis2.card_eq, T.axis3.card_eq]
  71
  72/-- Cardinality of the disjoint sum of three same-size RS-independent axes. -/
  73theorem disjoint_sum_card {n : ℕ} (S : RSDisjointSum3 n) :

papers checked against this theorem

No papers in the current corpus map onto this theorem yet.