pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
def

actionCost

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.UniversalForcing.Strict.Ethics
domain
Foundation
line
22 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Read the cached plain-language explainer.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.UniversalForcing.Strict.Ethics on GitHub at line 22.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

A cached Ask Recognition explainer exists for this declaration.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

  19  improvementRank : Nat
  20  deriving DecidableEq, Repr
  21
  22def actionCost (a b : ActionState) : Nat :=
  23  if a = b then 0 else 1
  24
  25@[simp] theorem actionCost_self (a : ActionState) : actionCost a a = 0 := by
  26  simp [actionCost]
  27
  28theorem actionCost_symm (a b : ActionState) : actionCost a b = actionCost b a := by
  29  by_cases h : a = b
  30  · subst h
  31    simp [actionCost]
  32  · have h' : b ≠ a := by intro hb; exact h hb.symm
  33    simp [actionCost, h, h']
  34
  35def preferenceCompose (a b : ActionState) : ActionState :=
  36  { agent := a.agent, improvementRank := a.improvementRank + b.improvementRank }
  37
  38def ethicalZero : ActionState := ⟨0, 0⟩
  39def minimalImprovement : ActionState := ⟨0, 1⟩
  40
  41/-- Strict ethical realization using minimal improvement as generator. -/
  42def strictEthicsRealization : StrictLogicRealization where
  43  Carrier := ActionState
  44  Cost := Nat
  45  zeroCost := inferInstance
  46  compare := actionCost
  47  compose := preferenceCompose
  48  one := ethicalZero
  49  generator := minimalImprovement
  50  identity_law := actionCost_self
  51  non_contradiction_law := actionCost_symm
  52  excluded_middle_law := True