theorem
proved
ordering_A_unequal
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Masses.SDGTForcing on GitHub at line 101.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
formal source
98def ordering_A_spans : ℕ × ℕ × ℕ := (13+11, 11+6, 6+8)
99def ordering_B_spans : ℕ × ℕ × ℕ := (8+11, 11+6, 6+13)
100
101theorem ordering_A_unequal : (13+11 : ℕ) ≠ 6+8 := by omega
102theorem ordering_B_equal : (8+11 : ℕ) = 6+13 := by omega
103
104/-- Ordering A has distinct up/down spans. -/
105theorem ordering_A_distinct_ends :
106 ordering_A_spans.1 ≠ ordering_A_spans.2.2 := by native_decide
107
108/-- Ordering B has equal up/down spans. -/
109theorem ordering_B_equal_ends :
110 ordering_B_spans.1 = ordering_B_spans.2.2 := by native_decide
111
112/-! ## Step 4: Charge Asymmetry Forces Ordering A
113
114The integerized charges are |Q̃_up| = 4 and |Q̃_down| = 2.
115Since 4 ≠ 2, the up and down sectors are physically distinct.
116Equal spans would imply charge-degenerate mass hierarchies.
117
118Ordering B (equal spans) is therefore excluded.
119Ordering A (unequal spans) is forced. -/
120
121def Q_tilde_up : ℕ := 4 -- |6 × 2/3| = 4
122def Q_tilde_down : ℕ := 2 -- |6 × 1/3| = 2
123
124theorem charges_distinct : Q_tilde_up ≠ Q_tilde_down := by native_decide
125
126/-- The larger charge gets the larger span.
127 |Q̃_up| = 4 > |Q̃_down| = 2, so span_up = 24 > span_down = 14. -/
128theorem larger_charge_larger_span :
129 Q_tilde_up > Q_tilde_down ∧
130 (13 + 11 : ℕ) > (6 + 8) := by
131 unfold Q_tilde_up Q_tilde_down