theorem
proved
sequential_optimization_forces_phi
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Mathematics.RamanujanBridge.ContinuedFractionPhi on GitHub at line 254.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
formal source
251
252/-- The sequential fixed-point core:
253 the continued-fraction update has φ as fixed point. -/
254theorem sequential_optimization_forces_phi :
255 cfracIteration phi = phi := phi_is_cfrac_fixed_point
256
257/-- Strong fixed-point form: any positive fixed point of `x ↦ 1 + 1/x` is `φ`.
258
259 (Interpretation) Any sequential optimization with:
260 (1) Self-similarity (same cost at every level)
261 (2) Strict convexity of cost functional
262 (3) Discrete (integer) choices at each level
263
264 converges to φ. This is because:
265 - Self-similarity → scale ratio r
266 - Optimality → r satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence
267 - Convexity → unique positive solution r² = r + 1 → r = φ
268
269 This is exactly the content of `fibonacci_partition_forces_phi`
270 from the Local Cache theorem, applied to continued fractions. -/
271theorem sequential_optimization_forces_phi_strong :
272 ∀ r : ℝ, 0 < r → r = 1 + 1 / r → r = phi := by
273 intro r hr hfix
274 have hr_ne : r ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hr
275 have hquad : r ^ 2 = r + 1 := by
276 have hrr : r * r = r * (1 + 1 / r) := by
277 exact congrArg (fun t : ℝ => r * t) hfix
278 have hmul : r * r = r + 1 := by
279 calc
280 r * r = r * (1 + 1 / r) := hrr
281 _ = r + 1 := by
282 field_simp [hr_ne]
283 simpa [pow_two] using hmul
284 have hphi : phi ^ 2 = phi + 1 := phi_sq_eq