structure
definition
NoPersistentNullAlignmentHypothesis
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.NavierStokes.RM2U.NonParasitism on GitHub at line 747.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
formal source
744vorticity direction (i.e. avoids the null-eigenvector cone everywhere on a time-thick top band set).
745
746At the spec layer this is an abstract implication between two events. -/
747structure NoPersistentNullAlignmentHypothesis
748 (TailLargeEvent HitEvent : ℝ → ℝ → Prop) : Prop where
749 exists_c :
750 ∃ c : ℝ,
751 0 < c ∧
752 ∀ (ε r : ℝ), 0 < ε → 0 < r →
753 TailLargeEvent ε r →
754 HitEvent ε r
755
756/-- **S3-P bookkeeping (spec layer):** export persistence splits into one of the three “cost channels”.
757
758This is intentionally abstract: it packages the output of the selection/drift-control machinery together with
759the algebraic split (`σ` vs perpendicular forcing) into a single logical splitter. -/
760structure ExportSplitHypothesis
761 (ExportEvent ForcingEvent NegativeSigmaEvent ConcavityEvent : ℝ → ℝ → Prop) : Prop where
762 split :
763 ∀ (ε r : ℝ),
764 0 < ε →
765 0 < r →
766 ExportEvent ε r →
767 ForcingEvent ε r ∨ NegativeSigmaEvent ε r ∨ ConcavityEvent ε r
768
769/-- **Export ⇒ payment/absorption/concavity** (spec layer).
770
771This mirrors TeX Lemma `lem:export_forces_payment_on_cylinder`, but keeps the PDE objects abstract.
772The only nontrivial content should sit inside:
773- `ExportSplitHypothesis` (selection + bridge into one of the three channels),
774- `NoRigidRotationAbsorptionHypothesis` (forcing ⇒ payment ∨ absorption),
775- `NegativeSigmaForcesBandPaymentHypothesis` (negative injection ⇒ band payment). -/
776structure ExportForcesPaymentHypothesis
777 (ExportEvent AbsorptionClass ConcavityEvent : ℝ → ℝ → Prop) (P : Payments) : Prop where