pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
structure

CausalClosureForced

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Papers.DIF.CausalClosure
domain
Papers
line
23 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Papers.DIF.CausalClosure on GitHub at line 23.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

  20  field_simp [hk.ne', ha.ne', hc.ne', Real.pi_ne_zero]
  21
  22/-- Proposition-level interface for A7: causal + scale-free closure. -/
  23structure CausalClosureForced where
  24  /-- Exponent on mode number `k` in `ω_eff ∝ k^β`. -/
  25  beta : ℝ
  26  /-- Exponent on scale factor `a` in `ω_eff ∝ a^(-gamma)`. -/
  27  gamma : ℝ
  28  /-- Dimensional closure result (linear in `k`, inverse in `a`). -/
  29  dimensional_forcing : beta = 1 ∧ gamma = 1
  30
  31/-- Gap 3 packaging: if dimensional forcing holds, closure scaling is fixed. -/
  32theorem scale_free_causal_closure (β γ : ℝ)
  33    (h_dim : β = 1 ∧ γ = 1) :
  34    β = 1 ∧ γ = 1 :=
  35  h_dim
  36
  37/-! ## Solar System scaling bound
  38
  39The editor flagged that naive extrapolation of w(k) gives a ~0.6% correction at 1 AU,
  40far exceeding PPN bounds of ~10⁻⁵. We formalize the honest numerical estimate here
  41so the paper can cite a machine-checked bound. -/
  42
  43/-- The ratio r_solar / r_0 for 1 AU and r_0 = 12 kpc.
  44    1 AU ≈ 4.85 × 10⁻⁹ kpc, so r_solar/r_0 ≈ 4 × 10⁻¹⁰.
  45    We use the conservative bound r_solar/r_0 < 5 × 10⁻¹⁰. -/
  46def solar_ratio_bound : ℝ := 5e-10
  47
  48/-- The kernel correction at Solar System scales exceeds PPN bounds
  49    when naively extrapolated. This theorem states that the correction
  50    w - 1 = C · (r/r₀)^α is positive for any positive r/r₀ and
  51    positive C, α. No UV cutoff is assumed.
  52
  53    This formalizes the Solar System tension identified in the paper: