religiousExperienceCert
plain-language theorem explainer
religiousExperienceCert constructs a concrete certificate that religious experience satisfies William James' four marks through J-cost equilibrium and instability. A researcher in Recognition Science or philosophy of mind would cite it to link subjective phenomenology to the J-cost functional derived from the forcing chain. The definition is a direct record constructor that assembles four prior results on type count, mark equality, equilibrium, and positive cost away from unity.
Claim. The definition supplies an instance of the ReligiousExperienceCert structure asserting that the cardinality of ReligiousExperienceType equals 5, that the four marks equal 4 (as configDim minus 1), that J-cost at argument 1 equals 0, and that J-cost at 1 + ε exceeds 0 for every ε > 0.
background
The module derives William James' four marks of religious experience from the J-cost function. Ineffability, noetic quality, transiency, and passivity are obtained by setting J-cost to zero at equilibrium and showing that any deviation raises cost. The structure ReligiousExperienceCert packages these properties together with the count of five canonical experience types, which equals configDim D. Upstream theorems establish the count by decision, the mark equality by decision, equilibrium via Jcost_unit0, and instability via Jcost_pos_of_ne_one.
proof idea
The definition is a direct record constructor. It sets the five_types field to the theorem religiousExperienceCount, the four_marks field to fourMarks_eq, the noetic_quality field to noetic_quality_eq_equilibrium, and the transiency field to transiency_instability. No tactics or reductions occur beyond field assignment.
why it matters
This definition certifies the formal link between religious phenomenology and the J-cost zero-equilibrium in the Recognition Science framework. It realizes the module claim that four marks equal configDim D minus 1 and five types equal D, closing the derivation from the forcing chain (T5 J-uniqueness, T8 D dimensions) and the Recognition Composition Law. No downstream uses are recorded, but the construction supports further philosophical applications of the phi-ladder and Berry threshold.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.