pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
def

predictions

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Quantum.DoubleSlit
domain
Quantum
line
220 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Quantum.DoubleSlit on GitHub at line 220.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 217    2. Single particles build up pattern ✓
 218    3. Which-path info destroys pattern ✓
 219    4. Quantum eraser recovers pattern ✓ -/
 220def predictions : List String := [
 221  "I(y) = 4 cos²(πdy/λL)",
 222  "Single particles show interference",
 223  "Measurement destroys interference",
 224  "Quantum eraser recovers interference"
 225]
 226
 227/-- Experimental tests:
 228    1. Young's original experiment (1801) - light ✓
 229    2. Davisson-Germer (1927) - electrons ✓
 230    3. Zeilinger et al. - fullerenes ✓
 231    4. Delayed-choice quantum eraser - photons ✓ -/
 232def experiments : List String := [
 233  "Young's double-slit (1801)",
 234  "Davisson-Germer electron diffraction (1927)",
 235  "Fullerene interference (1999)",
 236  "Delayed-choice quantum eraser (2000s)"
 237]
 238
 239/-! ## Falsification Criteria -/
 240
 241/-- The double-slit derivation would be falsified by:
 242    1. No interference for particles
 243    2. Which-path info not affecting pattern
 244    3. Quantum eraser not working
 245    4. Phase not related to path length -/
 246structure DoubleSlitFalsifier where
 247  /-- Type of potential falsification. -/
 248  falsifier : String
 249  /-- Status. -/
 250  status : String