pith. sign in
theorem

qm_interpretation_implies_cost_gap

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Quantum.QMInterpretationStructure
domain
Quantum
line
19 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

QM interpretation from the ledger requires that the J-cost of an entangled N-particle state exceeds the J-cost of the corresponding product state for every N greater than 1. Researchers modeling classical emergence via Recognition Science cost minimization cite this when deriving observable consequences of the interpretation. The proof is a direct one-line instantiation of the universal quantifier inside the hypothesis.

Claim. Let $h$ be the assumption that the QM interpretation structure holds, i.e., that for all natural numbers $N>1$ the entangled J-cost satisfies $J(N,1,1)>J(N,1)$ where $J$ denotes the product or entangled functional. Then for any such $N$, $J(N,1,1)>J(N,1)$.

background

Recognition Science assigns a J-cost to each configuration; the product-state cost is linear in particle number while the entangled cost adds quadratic cross terms. The module states that classical descriptions emerge precisely as J-cost minima. The upstream definition qm_interpretation_from_ledger encodes the interpretation as the proposition that entangled states carry strictly higher cost than product states for $N>1$. The supporting definitions supply the explicit formulas: jcostEntangled$(N,j,α)=N·j+α·N·(N-1)/2$ and jcostProduct$(N,j)=N·j$.

proof idea

The proof is a one-line term-mode wrapper that applies the hypothesis h directly to the parameters N and hN, instantiating the universal quantifier inside qm_interpretation_from_ledger.

why it matters

The result shows that the QM interpretation structure forces a strict cost gap between entangled and product states, reinforcing that classicality appears at J-cost minima within the Recognition framework. It supplies the concrete implication needed to connect the ledger-based interpretation to observable cost differences. No downstream theorems are recorded yet, so the declaration currently serves as a terminal implication step.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.