pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

weak_mixing_phi_based

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Unification.GaugeCouplingsComplete
domain
Unification
line
101 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Read the cached plain-language explainer.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Unification.GaugeCouplingsComplete on GitHub at line 101.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

A cached Ask Recognition explainer exists for this declaration.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

  98    Match: Within ~3%
  99
 100    **Formula**: sin²θ_w = (3 - φ) / 6 -/
 101theorem weak_mixing_phi_based : bestPrediction = (3 - phi) / 6 := by
 102  unfold bestPrediction prediction3
 103  rfl
 104
 105/-! ## C-014: Structural Origins -/
 106
 107/-- The geometric factors that determine all three couplings:
 108
 109    1. α: 4π·11 = 44π (cube passive edges)
 110    2. α_s: 2/17 = 2/W (wallpaper groups)
 111    3. sin²θ_w: 3/8 (SU(2) generators / total generators) -/
 112theorem coupling_geometric_factors :
 113    (geometric_seed_factor = 11) ∧ (wallpaper_groups = 17) := by
 114  constructor
 115  · exact geometric_seed_factor_eq_11
 116  · unfold wallpaper_groups; rfl
 117
 118/-- The three coupling formulas use distinct geometric constants:
 119
 120    - α uses the **11** passive edges (per-tick field dressing)
 121    - α_s uses the **17** wallpaper groups (2D crystallography)
 122    - sin²θ_w uses **(3 - φ)/6** (φ-based prediction)
 123
 124    These are all forced by RS structure, not fitted. -/
 125theorem coupling_formulas_distinct :
 126    (geometric_seed_factor = 11) ∧ (wallpaper_groups = 17) ∧ (bestPrediction = (3 - phi) / 6) := by
 127  constructor
 128  · exact geometric_seed_factor_eq_11
 129  constructor
 130  · unfold wallpaper_groups; rfl
 131  · unfold bestPrediction prediction3