pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0802.0743 · v1 · submitted 2008-02-06 · 📊 stat.ME

Recognition: unknown

Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models

M. J. Bayarri , M. E. Castellanos
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.ME
keywords bayesiancheckingmethodsmodelmodelshierarchicalinvestigatemany
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Hierarchical models are increasingly used in many applications. Along with this increased use comes a desire to investigate whether the model is compatible with the observed data. Bayesian methods are well suited to eliminate the many (nuisance) parameters in these complicated models; in this paper we investigate Bayesian methods for model checking. Since we contemplate model checking as a preliminary, exploratory analysis, we concentrate on objective Bayesian methods in which careful specification of an informative prior distribution is avoided. Numerous examples are given and different proposals are investigated and critically compared.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Maximum-likelihood-based posterior predictive checks detect model misspecification better than event-level versions for uncertain spin tilts, but current detector sensitivity limits their power; the Gaussian Component...