pith. sign in

arxiv: 1205.4909 · v2 · pith:WUG2G6E2new · submitted 2012-05-22 · ⚛️ physics.hist-ph

Geometry and Astronomy: Pre-Einstein Speculations of Non-Euclidean Space

classification ⚛️ physics.hist-ph
keywords geometrynon-euclideanspacewereastronomyattemptscenturycurved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The recognition that physical space (or space-time) is curved is a product of the general theory of relativity, such as dramatically shown by the 1919 solar eclipse measurements. However, the mathematical possibility of non-Euclidean geometries was recognized by Gauss more than a century earlier, and during the nineteenth century mathematicians developed the pioneering ideas of Gauss, Lobachevsky, Bolyai and Riemann into an elaborate branch of generalized geometry. Did the unimaginative physicists and astronomers ignore the new geometries? Were they considered to be of mathematical interest only until Einstein entered the scene? This paper examines in detail the attempts in the period from about 1830 to 1910 to establish links between non-Euclidean geometry and the physical and astronomical sciences, including attempts to find observational evidence for curved space. Although there were but few contributors to "non-Euclidean astronomy," there were more than usually supposed. The paper looks in particular on a work of 1872 in which the Leipzig physicist K. F. Zoellner argued that the universe is closed in accordance with Riemann's geometry.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Historical and Philosophical Aspects of the Einstein World

    physics.hist-ph 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A historical review of Einstein's 1917 paper on cosmology that discusses his views on inertia, space curvature and the cosmological constant while noting his lack of observational tests and model stability analysis.