pith. sign in

arxiv: 1211.6712 · v1 · pith:NSR7TNKXnew · submitted 2012-11-28 · 💻 cs.HC

The effects of graphical interface design characteristics on human-computer interaction task efficiency

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords graphicalcharacteristicscomputerdesignefficiencyinterfaceobjecttask
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:NSR7TNKX Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{NSR7TNKX}

Prints a linked pith:NSR7TNKX badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The main objective of this paper was to investigate the effects of a computer screen interface design and its related geometrical characteristics of 36 graphical objects on a user's task efficiency. A total of 490 subjects took part in laboratory experiments that focused on the direct manipulation of a visual dialogue between a user and a computer. The subjects were asked to select an object from among a group of items randomly placed on the computer screen that were visible exclusively during the visual search process. A model expressing the mean object acquisition time as a function of graphical object size and the configuration was developed and statistically validated. The model showed an influence of geometrical design characteristics of the graphical objects (icons) and their groupings (icon structures) on the observed task efficiency. The reported results can be used at those stages of a software lifecycle that concentrate on prototyping, designing, and implementing graphical solutions for the efficient graphical user-computer interface.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.