Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Knowledge-Based Trust: Estimating the Trustworthiness of Web Sources

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.03519 v1 pith:N3UITAP4 submitted 2015-02-12 cs.DB cs.IR

classification cs.DBcs.IR
keywords sourcetrustworthinessfactssourceserrorsextractedextractionfactual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The quality of web sources has been traditionally evaluated using exogenous signals such as the hyperlink structure of the graph. We propose a new approach that relies on endogenous signals, namely, the correctness of factual information provided by the source. A source that has few false facts is considered to be trustworthy. The facts are automatically extracted from each source by information extraction methods commonly used to construct knowledge bases. We propose a way to distinguish errors made in the extraction process from factual errors in the web source per se, by using joint inference in a novel multi-layer probabilistic model. We call the trustworthiness score we computed Knowledge-Based Trust (KBT). On synthetic data, we show that our method can reliably compute the true trustworthiness levels of the sources. We then apply it to a database of 2.8B facts extracted from the web, and thereby estimate the trustworthiness of 119M webpages. Manual evaluation of a subset of the results confirms the effectiveness of the method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty Awareness and Trust in Explainable AI- On Trust Calibration using Local and Global Explanations

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    People who saw uncertainty visualizations trusted a more certain model more, but the study does not demonstrate that this explanation calibrates trust better than numeric accuracy.

Pith tools