pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1507.00244 · v2 · submitted 2015-07-01 · 💱 q-fin.RM · q-fin.ST

Recognition: unknown

Expected Shortfall is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk - Implications for backtesting

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💱 q-fin.RM q-fin.ST
keywords riskbacktestingelicitableexpectedjointlyshortfallvaluecomment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this note, we comment on the relevance of elicitability for backtesting risk measure estimates. In particular, we propose the use of Diebold-Mariano tests, and show how they can be implemented for Expected Shortfall (ES), based on the recent result of Fissler and Ziegel (2015) that ES is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probabilistic Forecasting for Day-ahead Electricity Prices, Battery Trading Strategies and the Economic Evaluation of Predictive Accuracy

    q-fin.ST 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quantile-based trading strategies for battery arbitrage fail to incentivize honest probabilistic forecasts and ignore price dependence, while stochastic programs using full distributions better connect forecast accura...