Recognition: unknown
Expected Shortfall is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk - Implications for backtesting
classification
💱 q-fin.RM
q-fin.ST
keywords
riskbacktestingelicitableexpectedjointlyshortfallvaluecomment
read the original abstract
In this note, we comment on the relevance of elicitability for backtesting risk measure estimates. In particular, we propose the use of Diebold-Mariano tests, and show how they can be implemented for Expected Shortfall (ES), based on the recent result of Fissler and Ziegel (2015) that ES is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Probabilistic Forecasting for Day-ahead Electricity Prices, Battery Trading Strategies and the Economic Evaluation of Predictive Accuracy
Quantile-based trading strategies for battery arbitrage fail to incentivize honest probabilistic forecasts and ignore price dependence, while stochastic programs using full distributions better connect forecast accura...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.