pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1704.07837 · v1 · submitted 2017-04-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Biases from neutrino bias: to worry or not to worry?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords biasneutrinoanalysescosmologicaleffecthalomassmassive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The relation between the halo field and the matter fluctuations (halo bias), in the presence of massive neutrinos depends on the total neutrino mass, massive neutrinos introduce an additional scale-dependence of the bias which is usually neglected in cosmological analyses. We investigate the magnitude of the systematic effect on interesting cosmological parameters induced by neglecting this scale dependence, finding that while it is not a problem for current surveys, it is non-negligible for future, denser or deeper ones depending on the neutrino mass, the maximum scale used for the analyses and the details of the nuisance parameters considered. However there is a simple recipe to account for the bulk of the effect as to make it fully negligible, which we illustrate and advocate should be included in analysis of forthcoming large-scale structure surveys.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forecasting neutrino mass constraints from the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Roman Space Telescope forecasts using Hα galaxy mocks yield m_ν < 0.276 eV (68% CL) with Planck priors via EFT of LSS, and m_ν < 0.36 eV via model-independent phenomenological analysis.