REVIEW 2 cited by
Approximating Connected Safe Sets in Weighted Trees
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
For a graph $G$ and a non-negative integral weight function $w$ on the vertex set of $G$, a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is $w$-safe if $w(C)\geq w(D)$ for every component $C$ of the subgraph of $G$ induced by $S$ and every component $D$ of the subgraph of $G$ induced by the complement of $S$ such that some vertex in $C$ is adjacent to some vertex of $D$. The minimum weight $w(S)$ of a $w$-safe set $S$ is the safe number $s(G,w)$ of the weighted graph $(G,w)$, and the minimum weight of a $w$-safe set that induces a connected subgraph of $G$ is its connected safe number $cs(G,w)$. Bapat et al. showed that computing $cs(G,w)$ is NP-hard even when $G$ is a star. For a given weighted tree $(T,w)$, they described an efficient $2$-approximation algorithm for $cs(T,w)$ as well as an efficient $4$-approximation algorithm for $s(T,w)$. Addressing a problem they posed, we present a PTAS for the connected safe number of a weighted tree. Our PTAS partly relies on an exact pseudopolynomial time algorithm, which also allows to derive an asymptotic FPTAS for restricted instances. Finally, we extend a bound due to Fujita et al. from trees to block graphs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stable structure on safe set problems in vertex-weighted graphs
A connected bipartite graph has s(G,w)=cs(G,w) for every positive weight function w exactly when it is an even cycle, a double star, a book graph, K3,3 minus an edge, or one of the explicitly listed D or D* graph families.
-
Safe sets in digraphs
The paper proves NP-hardness for minimum safe sets in traceable acyclic digraphs and tournaments, gives a polynomial algorithm for tournaments with small strong components, but its ETH lower bound for slightly larger ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.