pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.01851 · v1 · pith:PNYPAB4Tnew · submitted 2018-03-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Cosmological constraints from the redshift dependence of the Alcock-Paczynski effect: Dynamical dark energy

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalanisotropicdarkenergyredshiftclusteringconstraintsdata
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We perform an anisotropic clustering analysis of 1,133,326 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release (DR) 12 covering the redshift range $0.15<z<0.69$. The geometrical distortions of the galaxy positions, caused by incorrect cosmological model assumptions, are captured in the anisotropic two-point correlation function on scales 6 -- 40 $h^{-1}\rm Mpc$. The redshift evolution of this anisotropic clustering is used to place constraints on the cosmological parameters. We improve the methodology of Li et al. 2016, to enable efficient exploration of high dimensional cosmological parameter spaces, and apply it to the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parametrization of dark energy, $w=w_0+w_a{z}/({1+z})$. In combination with the CMB, BAO, SNIa and $H_0$ from Cepheid data, we obtain $\Omega_m = 0.301 \pm 0.008,\ w_0 = -1.042 \pm 0.067,\ $ and $w_a = -0.07 \pm 0.29$ (68.3\% CL). Adding our new AP measurements to the aforementioned results reduces the error bars by $\sim$30 -- 40\% and improves the dark energy figure of merit by a factor of $\sim$2. We check the robustness of the results using realistic mock galaxy catalogues.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tomographic Alcock-Paczynski Test with Marked Correlation Functions

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First integration of tomographic AP tests with MCFs and PCA compression yields 48% and 45% tighter errors on Ω_m and w versus standard two-point functions.