Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

From LTL to rLTL Monitoring: Improved Monitorability through Robust Semantics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.08203 v5 pith:6WEWLIOA submitted 2018-07-21 cs.FL cs.LO

classification cs.FLcs.LO
keywords monitoringrobustsemanticsbauerformulaspropertiesviolatedalready
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Runtime monitoring is commonly used to detect the violation of desired properties in safety critical cyber-physical systems by observing its executions. Bauer et al. introduced an influential framework for monitoring Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) properties based on a three-valued semantics: the formula is already satisfied by the given prefix, it is already violated, or it is still undetermined, i.e., it can still be satisfied and violated by appropriate extensions. However, a wide range of formulas are not monitorable under this approach, meaning that they have a prefix for which satisfaction and violation will always remain undetermined no matter how it is extended. In particular, Bauer et al. report that 44% of the formulas they consider in their experiments fall into this category. Recently, a robust semantics for LTL was introduced to capture different degrees by which a property can be violated. In this paper we introduce a robust semantics for finite strings and show its potential in monitoring: every formula considered by Bauer et al. is monitorable under our approach. Furthermore, we discuss which properties that come naturally in LTL monitoring - such as the realizability of all truth values - can be transferred to the robust setting. Lastly, we show that LTL formulas with robust semantics can be monitored by deterministic automata and report on a prototype implementation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Monitor-Based Runtime Assurance for Temporal Logic Specifications

    eess.SY 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a safety controller that combines LTL monitor automata, a backup controller, and reachable-set checks to guarantee safety properties for nondeterministic continuous-state cyber-physical systems.

  2. Why Formal Monitors Fail: Attack Distribution Entropy as a Coverage Bound for LTL-Based LLM Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2026-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The central bound is a definitional restatement, the entropy-to-coverage corollary is false, and the empirical correlation is built on the monitor's own misses.

Pith tools