Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A note on the mild solutions of Hilfer impulsive fractional differential equations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.09256 v1 pith:2VLNLQTS submitted 2018-11-22 math.CA

J. Vanterler da C. Sousa , D. S. Oliveira , E. Capelas de Oliveira This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA
keywords deltadifferentialfractionalmildbanachcasesclassdiscuss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we present a new class of inequality of the Gronwall type and discuss some particular cases. In this sense, we investigate the uniqueness and $\delta$-Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability of the mild solution for the fractional differential equation with non-instantaneous impulses in a P$\delta$-normed Banach space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Impulsive Implicit $\Psi$--Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations with Delay

    math.DS 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims unique solutions and Ulam-Hyers-Mittag-Leffler stability for implicit impulsive Psi-Hilfer fractional differential equations with delay, but the stability proof relies on a false monotonicity assertion.

  2. Analysis of Impulsive $\varphi$--Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations

    math.DS 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Extends standard existence, stability, and dependence theorems to impulsive phi-Hilfer fractional differential equations, but the claimed result on dependence on the derivative order is not correctly proved.

Pith tools