pith. sign in

arxiv: 1905.06084 · v1 · pith:YLCSDYKNnew · submitted 2019-05-15 · 💻 cs.DS

Restricted Max-Min Allocation: Approximation and Integrality Gap

classification 💻 cs.DS
keywords approximationdeltaalgorithmintegralityconfigurationallocationboundconstant
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Asadpour, Feige, and Saberi proved that the integrality gap of the configuration LP for the restricted max-min allocation problem is at most $4$. However, their proof does not give a polynomial-time approximation algorithm. A lot of efforts have been devoted to designing an efficient algorithm whose approximation ratio can match this upper bound for the integrality gap. In ICALP 2018, we present a $(6 + \delta)$-approximation algorithm where $\delta$ can be any positive constant, and there is still a gap of roughly $2$. In this paper, we narrow the gap significantly by proposing a $(4+\delta)$-approximation algorithm where $\delta$ can be any positive constant. The approximation ratio is with respect to the optimal value of the configuration LP, and the running time is $\mathit{poly}(m,n)\cdot n^{\mathit{poly}(\frac{1}{\delta})}$ where $n$ is the number of players and $m$ is the number of resources. We also improve the upper bound for the integrality gap of the configuration LP to $3 + \frac{21}{26} \approx 3.808$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Submodular Max-Min Allocation under Identical Valuations

    cs.DS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A greedy algorithm achieves 0.4-approximation for submodular max-min allocation with identical valuations and yields the first constant upper bound on the configuration LP integrality gap.