REVIEW 2 cited by
Why case fatality ratios can be misleading: individual- and population-based mortality estimates and factors influencing them
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Different ways of calculating mortality ratios during epidemics have yielded very different results, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We formulate both a survival probability model and an associated infection duration-dependent SIR model to define individual- and population-based estimates of dynamic mortality ratios. The key parameters that affect the dynamics of the different mortality estimates are the incubation period and the time individuals were infected before confirmation of infection. We stress that none of these ratios are accurately represented by the often misinterpreted case fatality ratio (CFR), the number of deaths to date divided by the total number of confirmed infected cases to date. Using data on the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, we estimate and compare the different dynamic mortality ratios and highlight their differences. Informed by our modeling, we propose more systematic methods to determine mortality ratios during epidemic outbreaks and discuss sensitivity to confounding effects and uncertainties in the data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Super-resolution wavefront reconstruction in adaptive-optics with pyramid sensors
Offset sampling grids in a pyramid wavefront sensor double the number of reconstructable wavefront modes and, with full-rank intensity processing, allow simultaneous phase and amplitude sensing.
-
ORCA: Unveiling Obscure Containers In The Wild
ORCA reconstructs container layer history to detect packages hidden by deleted metadata or source-built software, reporting a median 40% higher file coverage than Docker Scout and Syft.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.