Bohr phenomenon for certain close-to-convex analytic functions
Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 14:19 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Four subclasses of close-to-convex functions obey the Bohr phenomenon inside an explicit radius R_f obtained from a subordination lemma.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The classes S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), and K_s(φ) satisfy the Bohr phenomenon: for every f in any one of these classes there is a radius R_f < 1 such that sum_{n=1}^∞ |a_n z^n| ≤ dist(f(0), ∂f(D)) whenever |z| ≤ R_f. The radii are derived via the subordination-class lemma and become sharp once φ satisfies additional conditions.
What carries the argument
The Bohr radius R_f obtained by applying the subordination-class lemma to the subordination relations that define each of the four classes.
If this is right
- The Bohr inequality holds inside |z| ≤ R_f for every function in S_c^*(φ).
- The same statement holds for every function in C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), and K_s(φ).
- When φ meets the extra conditions the radius R_f is the best possible for the class.
- Special choices of φ recover or extend previously known Bohr radii for starlike and convex subclasses.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same subordination-lemma route could be used to obtain Bohr radii for other classes defined by subordination that are not necessarily close-to-convex.
- The sharpness criteria on φ identify candidate extremal functions by restricting the growth of φ.
- Combining the Bohr inequality with the defining subordinations may produce new uniform bounds on coefficients or growth for these classes.
Load-bearing premise
The cited lemma on Bohr phenomenon for subordination classes applies directly to the four new classes without further restrictions on φ.
What would settle it
An explicit function belonging to one of the four classes for which the majorant inequality fails at some radius strictly larger than the derived R_f.
read the original abstract
We say that a class $\mathcal{B}$ of analytic functions $f$ of the form $f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}z^{n}$ in the unit disk $\mathbb{D}:=\{z\in \mathbb{C}: |z|<1\}$ satisfies a Bohr phenomenon if for the largest radius $R_{f}<1$, the following inequality $$ \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} |a_{n}z^{n}| \leq d(f(0),\partial f(\mathbb{D}) ) $$ holds for $|z|=r\leq R_{f}$ and for all functions $f \in \mathcal{B}$. The largest radius $R_{f}$ is called Bohr radius for the class $\mathcal{B}$. In this article, we obtain Bohr radius for certain subclasses of close-to-convex analytic functions. We establish the Bohr phenomenon for certain analytic classes $\mathcal{S}_{c}^{*}(\phi),\,\mathcal{C}_{c}(\phi),\, \mathcal{C}_{s}^{*}(\phi),\, \mathcal{K}_{s}(\phi)$. Using Bohr phenomenon for subordination classes \cite[Lemma 1]{bhowmik-2018}, we obtain some radius $R_{f}$ such that Bohr phenomenon for these classes holds for $|z|=r\leq R_{f}$. Generally, in this case $R_{f}$ need not be sharp, but we show that under some additional conditions on $\phi$, the radius $R_{f}$ becomes sharp bound. As a consequence of these results, we obtain several interesting corollaries on Bohr phenomenon for the aforesaid classes.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims to establish the Bohr phenomenon for the analytic function classes S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), and K_s(φ) inside the unit disk. It invokes Lemma 1 from Bhowmik et al. (2018) on subordination classes to derive an explicit radius R_f such that the Bohr inequality ∑|a_n z^n| ≤ d(f(0), ∂f(D)) holds for |z| ≤ R_f for all f in each class; under additional conditions on φ the radius is asserted to be sharp, yielding several corollaries.
Significance. If the direct applicability of the cited lemma is verified, the work supplies concrete Bohr radii for four new subclasses of close-to-convex functions and identifies sharpness cases, thereby extending known results on Bohr phenomena from subordination classes to these geometrically defined families.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract (statement after citation of Lemma 1) and the definitions of the four classes] The central derivation obtains R_f for S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), and K_s(φ) solely by citing Lemma 1 of bhowmik-2018. The manuscript must explicitly confirm that each class satisfies the lemma's hypotheses (subordination form, range of the subordinating function, and any restrictions on φ) without extra conditions beyond those already present in the class definitions; otherwise the radius formulas and sharpness claims do not follow directly.
- [Abstract and the paragraph containing the sharpness statement] The sharpness assertion under 'some additional conditions on φ' is load-bearing for the optimality claim yet is stated without a derivation showing how those conditions produce an extremal function attaining equality; the text should supply the explicit construction or reference the precise extra hypothesis that closes the argument.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Notation for the distance d(f(0), ∂f(D)) should be defined at first use or cross-referenced to a standard source.
- [References] The citation [Lemma 1]{bhowmik-2018} should include the full bibliographic entry and page or theorem number for easy verification.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and the specific suggestions for improving the clarity and rigor of the arguments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit verifications and derivations.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract (statement after citation of Lemma 1) and the definitions of the four classes] The central derivation obtains R_f for S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), and K_s(φ) solely by citing Lemma 1 of bhowmik-2018. The manuscript must explicitly confirm that each class satisfies the lemma's hypotheses (subordination form, range of the subordinating function, and any restrictions on φ) without extra conditions beyond those already present in the class definitions; otherwise the radius formulas and sharpness claims do not follow directly.
Authors: We agree that an explicit confirmation strengthens the manuscript. Although the definitions of the four classes are constructed to satisfy the subordination hypotheses of Lemma 1 from Bhowmik et al. (2018) with no additional restrictions on φ beyond those already stated, the revised version will add a short dedicated paragraph immediately after the class definitions. This paragraph will verify, for each class separately, that the subordination form holds, that the subordinating function lies in the required range, and that the conditions on φ match those of the lemma exactly. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract and the paragraph containing the sharpness statement] The sharpness assertion under 'some additional conditions on φ' is load-bearing for the optimality claim yet is stated without a derivation showing how those conditions produce an extremal function attaining equality; the text should supply the explicit construction or reference the precise extra hypothesis that closes the argument.
Authors: We acknowledge that the current text states the sharpness result under additional conditions on φ but does not supply the explicit construction of the extremal function. In the revision we will insert the missing derivation: we will specify the precise extra hypothesis on φ (a suitable normalization or extremal choice) and construct the corresponding function f in each class for which equality holds in the Bohr inequality at the asserted radius, thereby confirming sharpness. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity; external lemma applied to defined classes
full rationale
The central step invokes Lemma 1 from the external citation bhowmik-2018 to obtain radii R_f for the four classes defined in the paper. This citation does not overlap with the present authors, is not load-bearing via self-reference, and introduces no self-definitional reduction or fitted-input renaming. The classes S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), K_s(φ) are introduced via their own analytic conditions, after which the external lemma is applied; sharpness under extra conditions on φ is stated separately. No equation or claim reduces to its own inputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Analytic functions in the unit disk satisfy the usual power-series expansion and subordination relations.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We establish the Bohr phenomenon for certain analytic classes S_c^*(φ), C_c(φ), C_s^*(φ), K_s(φ). Using Bohr phenomenon for subordination classes [Lemma 1]{bhowmik-2018}
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Bohr Phenomenon for analytic functions on simply connected domains
Authors derive sharp radii for the Bohr phenomenon applied to analytic functions on the family of domains Ω_γ for 0 ≤ γ < 1.
-
The Bohr inequality for certain harmonic mappings
Bohr radii are derived for harmonic mappings in the classes HC(phi) and HC_c(phi) defined by subordination and linear dilation using a cited lemma on subordination classes.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Abu-Muhanna , Bohr’s phenomenon in subordination and bounded harmonic c lasses, Complex Var
Y. Abu-Muhanna , Bohr’s phenomenon in subordination and bounded harmonic c lasses, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 55 (2010), 1071–1078
work page 2010
-
[2]
Y. Abu-Muhanna and R. M. Ali , Bohr’s phenomenon for analytic functions into the exterio r of a compact convex body, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 379 (2011), 512–517
work page 2011
-
[3]
Y. Abu Muhanna and R. M. Ali , Bohr’s phenomenon for analytic functions and the hy- perbolic metric, Math. Nachr. 286 (2013), 1059–1065
work page 2013
-
[4]
Y.Abu Muhanna, R. M. Ali, Z. C. Ng and S. F. M Hasni , Bohr radius for subordinating families of analytic functions and bounded harmonic mappin gs, J. Math. Anal.Appl. 420 (2014), 124–136
work page 2014
-
[5]
L.Aizenberg, Multidimensional analogues of Bohr’s theorem on power ser ies, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 1147–1155
work page 2000
-
[6]
L.Aizenberg, Generalization of results about the Bohr radius for power s eries, Stud. Math. 180 (2007), 161–168. 18 Vasudevarao Allu and Himadri Halder
work page 2007
-
[7]
R. M. Ali, R.W. Barnard and A.Yu. Solynin , A note on Bohr’s phenomenon for power series, J. Math. Anal.Appl. 449 (2017), 154-167
work page 2017
-
[8]
R. M. Ali, N. K.Jain and V. Ra vichandran, Bohr radius for classes of analytic functions, Results Math. 74 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[9]
S. A. Alkhaleef ah, I.R. Kayumov and S. Ponnusamy , On the Bohr inequality with a fixed zero coefficient, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 147 (2019), 5263–5274
work page 2019
- [10]
-
[11]
V asudev arao Alluand Himadri Halder , Bohr radius for certain classes of starlike and convex univalent functions, J. Math. Anal.Appl. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124519
-
[12]
B. Bhowmik and N. Das , Bohr phenomenon for subordinating families of certain uni valent functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 462 (2018), 1087–1098
work page 2018
-
[13]
H.P. Boas and D. Kha vinson, Bohr’s power series theorem in several variables, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc 125 (1997), 2975–2979
work page 1997
-
[14]
Bohr , A theorem concerning power series, Proc
H. Bohr , A theorem concerning power series, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc . s2-13 (1914), 1–5
work page 1914
-
[15]
N. E. Cho , O. S. Kwon and V. Ra vichandran, Coefficient, distortion and growth inequal- ities for certain close-to-convex functions, J. Inequal. Appl. 2011:100 (2011), 7pp
work page 2011
- [16]
-
[17]
I. Graham and D. V arolin, Bloch constants in one and several variables, Pacific J. Math. 174 (1996), 347–357
work page 1996
-
[18]
I.R. Kayumov and S. Ponnusamy , Bohr’s inequalities for the analytic functions with lacu- nary series and harmonic functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 465 (2018), 857–871
work page 2018
-
[19]
K.Khatter, V. Ra vichandran and S. Siv aprasad Kumar, Starlike functions associated with exponential function and the lemniscate of Bernoulli, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas F ´is. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 113 (2019), 233–253
work page 2019
-
[20]
J. Kow alczykand E. Les-Bomba , On a subclass of close-to-convex functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 23 (2010), 1147–1151
work page 2010
-
[21]
Sakaguchi , On a certain univalent mapping, J
K. Sakaguchi , On a certain univalent mapping, J. Math. Soc. Japan 11 (1959), 72–75
work page 1959
-
[22]
S. Siv aprasad Kumar and S. Banga , On a special type of Non-Ma-Minda function, arXiv:2006.02111v1, 2020
- [23]
-
[24]
V. S. Masih and S. Kanas , Subclasses of Starlike and Convex functions associated wi th associated with the LimaÃğon Domain, Symmetry 12 (2020), 942
work page 2020
-
[25]
R. K.Raina and J. Sokol , Some properties related to a certain class of starlike func tions, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 353 (2015), 973–978
work page 2015
-
[26]
Ra vichandran, Starlike and convex functions with respect to conjugte poi nts, Acta Math
V. Ra vichandran, Starlike and convex functions with respect to conjugte poi nts, Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyhazi. 20 (2004), 31–37
work page 2004
-
[27]
Ronning, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of st arlike functions, Proc
F. Ronning, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of st arlike functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1993), 189–196
work page 1993
-
[28]
Thomas , Nikola Tuneski and Allu V asudev arao, Univalent functions
Derek K. Thomas , Nikola Tuneski and Allu V asudev arao, Univalent functions. A primer, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 69. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2018
work page 2018
- [29]
-
[30]
Z-G W ang, C-Y Gao and S-M Yuan , On certain subclasses of close-to-convex and quasi- convex functions with respect to k-symmetric points, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 322 (2006), 97–106. V asudev arao Allu, School of Basic Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubanesw ar, Bhubanesw ar-752050, Odisha, India. E-mail address : avrao@iitbbs.ac.in Himadri Halder,...
work page 2006
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.