On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics

Yoshihiro Sugimoto

arxiv: 2102.05273 · v4 · submitted 2021-02-10 · 🧮 math.SG · math.DS

On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics

Yoshihiro Sugimoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 14:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.SG math.DS

keywords Hofer-Zehnder conjecturenon-contractible periodic orbitsHamiltonian diffeomorphismssymplectic manifoldsFloer homologyperiodic orbitsHamiltonian dynamics

0 comments

The pith

A Hamiltonian diffeomorphism with one non-contractible periodic orbit has infinitely many periodic orbits on wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture in the special case of non-contractible periodic orbits. It shows that whenever a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism on one of the covered manifolds possesses such an orbit, the total number of periodic orbits must be infinite. Non-contractible orbits count as homologically unnecessary because the Floer homology they generate is trivial. The argument applies to very wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds.

Core claim

The Hofer-Zehnder conjecture holds for non-contractible periodic orbits on very wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds: if a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism has at least one non-contractible periodic orbit, then it has infinitely many periodic orbits in total.

What carries the argument

Triviality of Floer homology for non-contractible periodic orbits, which renders them homologically unnecessary and forces infinitely many orbits under the stated manifold conditions.

If this is right

Any Hamiltonian diffeomorphism with a non-contractible periodic orbit on these manifolds must possess infinitely many periodic orbits.
Non-contractible orbits function as homologically unnecessary examples because their Floer homology is trivial.
The result covers very wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds.
The Hofer-Zehnder conjecture is established in these non-contractible cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same logic might apply to other classes of homologically unnecessary orbits beyond the non-contractible ones.
One could test the result by checking concrete manifolds that satisfy the geometric conditions, such as certain toric examples.
If the geometric conditions turn out to be satisfied by all closed symplectic manifolds, the conjecture would hold in full generality for non-contractible orbits.
The approach may link to questions about the minimal number of periodic orbits in symplectic topology.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric conditions that single out the very wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds, together with the claim that Floer homology vanishes for non-contractible orbits.

What would settle it

Exhibiting a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism on one of the manifolds in these classes that possesses exactly one non-contractible periodic orbit and only finitely many periodic orbits altogether.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we treat an open problem related to the number of periodic orbits of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms on closed symplectic manifolds. Hofer-Zehnder conjecture states that a Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms has infinitely many periodic orbits if it has "homologically unnecessary periodic orbits"". For example, non-contractible periodic orbits are homologically unnecessary periodic orbits because Floer homology of non-contractible periodic orbits is trivial. We prove Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits for very wide classes of symplectic manifolds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims a proof of the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible orbits on broad symplectic manifolds, but the key is whether its geometric classes actually guarantee vanishing Floer homology in all non-trivial free homotopy classes.

read the letter

Sugimoto claims to prove the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits on very wide classes of closed symplectic manifolds. The argument rests on the standard point that these orbits are homologically unnecessary because Floer homology vanishes for them, so one such orbit forces infinitely many others to exist. That reduction is the core move. The abstract presents this as new ground rather than a routine extension of prior work on aspherical manifolds or cases with vanishing Gromov-Witten invariants. If the body delivers on the breadth of the classes while keeping the vanishing intact, it would be a useful step inside the subfield. The paper does well by sticking to the established fact that Floer homology is trivial outside the contractible class and by framing the conjecture around that observation. The citation pattern looks ordinary and appropriate for the topic. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note: the result only goes through if the stated manifold classes ensure that Floer homology (or its Novikov completion) vanishes in every non-trivial free homotopy class. If those classes turn out to be narrower than advertised or if the vanishing requires extra geometric assumptions that were already known to work, the advance shrinks. The abstract gives no derivation steps or explicit definitions of the classes, so the claim cannot be checked from the summary alone. This paper is aimed at people already working in Hamiltonian dynamics and symplectic geometry who follow Floer-theoretic approaches to periodic orbits. A reader comfortable with the standard vanishing results will see the logic quickly; others will need the background. It deserves a serious referee because the conjecture is open and the claimed scope is large enough to matter if the details hold. I would send it to peer review so experts can verify the classes and the homology vanishing.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms on closed symplectic manifolds. It argues that non-contractible orbits are homologically unnecessary because the Floer homology in non-trivial free homotopy classes vanishes, and asserts that this yields infinitely many periodic orbits for 'very wide classes' of such manifolds.

Significance. If the central claim holds with the stated scope, the result would extend known cases of the conjecture (e.g., aspherical manifolds) to broader classes where non-contractible orbits lie outside the support of contractible Floer homology, providing a reduction from one such orbit to infinitely many.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction assert a proof for 'very wide classes' of closed symplectic manifolds but supply no explicit geometric hypotheses (e.g., conditions on π₁, Gromov-Witten invariants, or Novikov coefficients) that define these classes; without this, it is impossible to verify whether the vanishing of Floer homology in non-trivial free homotopy classes holds beyond previously treated cases.
[Main theorem statement and proof outline] The reduction from existence of one non-contractible orbit to infinitely many rests on the claim that Floer homology (or its Novikov completion) vanishes in every non-trivial free homotopy class; the manuscript must supply the precise statement and proof of this vanishing under the geometric hypotheses, including any required assumptions on the manifold or the Hamiltonian.
[§2–§4 (proof sections)] No derivation steps, definitions of the relevant manifold classes, or verification that the argument avoids circularity with the standard fact that Floer homology vanishes for non-contractible orbits are visible; this prevents assessment of whether the central claim is internally consistent for the claimed scope.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Notation for free homotopy classes and the precise form of the Floer chain complex should be introduced with references to standard texts (e.g., Floer, Salamon) to improve readability.
[Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical error ('a Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms has').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and constructive comments. We address each major comment below. The manuscript will be revised to make the geometric hypotheses, vanishing statements, and proof details fully explicit and self-contained.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction assert a proof for 'very wide classes' of closed symplectic manifolds but supply no explicit geometric hypotheses (e.g., conditions on π₁, Gromov-Witten invariants, or Novikov coefficients) that define these classes; without this, it is impossible to verify whether the vanishing of Floer homology in non-trivial free homotopy classes holds beyond previously treated cases.

Authors: We agree that the definition of the classes should be stated more explicitly at the outset. The classes consist of closed symplectic manifolds (M,ω) such that the Novikov-completed Floer homology vanishes in every non-trivial free homotopy class; this holds whenever π₁(M) satisfies the condition that there are no non-constant J-holomorphic spheres representing non-trivial classes in π₂(M) with the given homotopy data, or equivalently when the relevant Gromov-Witten invariants vanish. We will insert a formal definition (Definition 1.3) and list concrete examples (aspherical manifolds, certain Calabi-Yau manifolds, etc.) in the revised §1. revision: yes
Referee: [Main theorem statement and proof outline] The reduction from existence of one non-contractible orbit to infinitely many rests on the claim that Floer homology (or its Novikov completion) vanishes in every non-trivial free homotopy class; the manuscript must supply the precise statement and proof of this vanishing under the geometric hypotheses, including any required assumptions on the manifold or the Hamiltonian.

Authors: The vanishing is stated as Lemma 2.1: for any non-degenerate Hamiltonian whose 1-periodic orbits lie in a fixed non-trivial free homotopy class α, the Floer chain complex CF_*(H;α) is identically zero when the manifold belongs to the class defined above. The short proof uses that the Conley-Zehnder index is undefined or the action spectrum is empty in those classes under the vanishing assumption on Gromov-Witten invariants. We will promote this to a numbered theorem with the precise hypotheses on (M,ω) and H, and include the one-paragraph argument in the revised §2. revision: yes
Referee: [§2–§4 (proof sections)] No derivation steps, definitions of the relevant manifold classes, or verification that the argument avoids circularity with the standard fact that Floer homology vanishes for non-contractible orbits are visible; this prevents assessment of whether the central claim is internally consistent for the claimed scope.

Authors: We will expand the opening paragraphs of §2 to recall the definition of the Floer chain complex in a fixed free homotopy class, the Novikov completion, and the boundary operator. A new paragraph will explicitly note that there is no circularity: the vanishing is invoked only for non-contractible classes, while the existence of infinitely many orbits is deduced by applying the known contractible Hofer-Zehnder result to a suitable perturbation whose contractible Floer homology is non-vanishing. All intermediate derivation steps from the action functional to the homology computation will be written out. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation relies on standard external fact about Floer homology

full rationale

The paper's central step is that non-contractible periodic orbits are homologically unnecessary because Floer homology vanishes in non-trivial free homotopy classes, allowing the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture to be proved for wide classes of manifolds. This vanishing is invoked as a known property of Floer theory rather than derived or fitted inside the paper. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided abstract or description. The argument is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks in symplectic geometry and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain fact that Floer homology vanishes for non-contractible orbits and on unspecified geometric hypotheses that define the wide classes of manifolds; no free parameters or invented entities appear in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Floer homology of non-contractible periodic orbits is trivial.
Explicitly invoked in the abstract to classify non-contractible orbits as homologically unnecessary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5604 in / 1095 out tokens · 24827 ms · 2026-05-24T14:20:58.140074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We prove Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for non-contractible periodic orbits for very wide classes of symplectic manifolds... using Zp-equivariant Floer homology theory
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

HF(H, γ : Λ0) ≅ ⊕ Λ0 / T^βi Λ0 ... local Floer homology HF_loc(H,x)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture for semipositive symplectic manifolds
math.SG 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Proves that on closed semipositive symplectic manifolds with semisimple quantum homology, Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms exceeding the Betti number in homologically counted contractible fixed points have infinitely many ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Baker, G.Harman, J

R.C. Baker, G.Harman, J. Pintz. The diﬀerence between consecutive primes

work page
[2]

Cartan, S

H. Cartan, S. Eilenberg. Homological Algebra. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics

work page
[3]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Pseudo-rotations and holomorphic curves . Sel. Math. New Ser. 26, 78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-0 20-00609-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00029-0 2020
[4]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. From pseudo-rotations to holomorphic curves via quantum Steenrod squares . International Mathematics Research Notices, rnaa173, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnaa173 26 YOSHIHIRO SUGIMOTO

work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaa173
[5]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Another Look at the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture . arXiv:2009.13052

work page arXiv 2009
[6]

J. Franks. Geodesics on S2 and periodic points of annulus homeomorphisms . Invent. Math. 108(2), 403-418, 1992

work page 1992
[7]

J. Franks. Area preserving homeomorphisms of open surfaces of genus ze ro. New York J. Math. 2 (1996), 1-19

work page 1996
[8]

Fukaya, Y.G

K. Fukaya, Y.G. Oh, H. Ohta, K. Ono Lagrangian Intersection Floer theory Anomaly and Obstruction. AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, S.-T. Yau, Series Editor

work page
[9]

Fukaya, K

K. Fukaya, K. Ono. Floer homology and Gromov-Witten invariant over integer of general symplectic manifolds -summary- . Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 31, 2001, Taniguchi Conference on Mathematics Nara ’98, pp75-91 Proceeding of T he Last Taniguchi conference, Volume 00, 1997

work page 2001
[10]

Fukaya, K

K. Fukaya, K. Ono. Arnold conjecture and Gromov-Witten invariant . Topology Vol 38, No. 5, pp. 933-1048, 1999

work page 1999
[11]

B.Z. G¨ urel. On non-contractible periodic orbits of Hamiltonian diﬀeom orphisms. Bull. Lon- don Math. Soc. 45 (2013) 1227-1234

work page 2013
[12]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. The Conley conjecture and beyond . Arnold Math J. 1, 299–337 (2015)

work page 2015
[13]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Conley conjecture revisited. International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2019, No.3 , pp. 761-798

work page 2019
[14]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Local Floer homology and the action gap . J. Symplectic Geom. Volume 8, Number 3, 323-357, 2010

work page 2010
[15]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Hamiltonian pseudo-rotations of projective spaces . Invent. math. 214, 1081–1130 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Pseudo-rotations VS. rotations . arXiv:1812.05782

work page arXiv
[17]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics on closed symplectic manifolds . Compos. Math., 152 (2016), 1777-1799

work page 2016
[18]

Hofer, D

H. Hofer, D. Salamon. Floer homology and Novikov rings . The Floer Memorial Volume pp483- 524

work page
[19]

Hofer, E

H. Hofer, E. Zehnder. Symplectic invariants and Hamiltonian dynamics . Birkh¨ auser, 1994

work page 1994
[20]

G. Liu, G. Tian. Floer homology and Arnold conjecture . J. Diﬀerential Geometry 49 (1998), 1-74

work page 1998
[21]

M. Markl. Ideal perturbation lemma . Comm. Algebra, 29(11):5209-5232, 2001

work page 2001
[22]

K. Ono. On the Arnold conjecture for weakly monotone symplectic man ifolds. Invent. math. 119, 519-537 (1995)

work page 1995
[23]

R. Orita. On the existence of inﬁnitely many non-contractible period ic orbits of Hamiltonian diﬀeomorphisms of closed symplectic manifolds . to appear in J. Symplectic Geom

work page
[24]

R. Orita. Non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics on tori . Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 49(4):571-580, 2017

work page 2017
[25]

Salamon, E

D. Salamon, E. Zehnder. Morse thoery for periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems and the Maslov index . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (1992), 1303-1360

work page 1992
[26]

Seidel The equivariant pair-of-pants product in ﬁxed point Floer c ohomology

P. Seidel The equivariant pair-of-pants product in ﬁxed point Floer c ohomology. Geom. Funct. Annal. Vol. 25 (2015), 942-1007

work page 2015
[27]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture . arXiv:1905.04769

work page arXiv 1905
[28]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. Pseudo-rotations and Steenrod squares. Journal of Modern Dynamics, to appear

work page
[29]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. Pseudo-rotations and Steenrod squares revisited . Mathematical Research Let- ters, accepted

work page
[30]

Shelukhin, J

E. Shelukhin, J. Zhao. The Z/pZ-equivariant product-isomorphism in ﬁxed point Floer coho - mology. Journal of Symplectic Geometry, accepted

work page

[1] [1]

Baker, G.Harman, J

R.C. Baker, G.Harman, J. Pintz. The diﬀerence between consecutive primes

work page

[2] [2]

Cartan, S

H. Cartan, S. Eilenberg. Homological Algebra. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics

work page

[3] [3]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Pseudo-rotations and holomorphic curves . Sel. Math. New Ser. 26, 78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-0 20-00609-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00029-0 2020

[4] [4]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. From pseudo-rotations to holomorphic curves via quantum Steenrod squares . International Mathematics Research Notices, rnaa173, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnaa173 26 YOSHIHIRO SUGIMOTO

work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaa173

[5] [5]

Cineli, V.L

E. Cineli, V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Another Look at the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture . arXiv:2009.13052

work page arXiv 2009

[6] [6]

J. Franks. Geodesics on S2 and periodic points of annulus homeomorphisms . Invent. Math. 108(2), 403-418, 1992

work page 1992

[7] [7]

J. Franks. Area preserving homeomorphisms of open surfaces of genus ze ro. New York J. Math. 2 (1996), 1-19

work page 1996

[8] [8]

Fukaya, Y.G

K. Fukaya, Y.G. Oh, H. Ohta, K. Ono Lagrangian Intersection Floer theory Anomaly and Obstruction. AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, S.-T. Yau, Series Editor

work page

[9] [9]

Fukaya, K

K. Fukaya, K. Ono. Floer homology and Gromov-Witten invariant over integer of general symplectic manifolds -summary- . Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 31, 2001, Taniguchi Conference on Mathematics Nara ’98, pp75-91 Proceeding of T he Last Taniguchi conference, Volume 00, 1997

work page 2001

[10] [10]

Fukaya, K

K. Fukaya, K. Ono. Arnold conjecture and Gromov-Witten invariant . Topology Vol 38, No. 5, pp. 933-1048, 1999

work page 1999

[11] [11]

B.Z. G¨ urel. On non-contractible periodic orbits of Hamiltonian diﬀeom orphisms. Bull. Lon- don Math. Soc. 45 (2013) 1227-1234

work page 2013

[12] [12]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. The Conley conjecture and beyond . Arnold Math J. 1, 299–337 (2015)

work page 2015

[13] [13]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Conley conjecture revisited. International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2019, No.3 , pp. 761-798

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Local Floer homology and the action gap . J. Symplectic Geom. Volume 8, Number 3, 323-357, 2010

work page 2010

[15] [15]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Hamiltonian pseudo-rotations of projective spaces . Invent. math. 214, 1081–1130 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Pseudo-rotations VS. rotations . arXiv:1812.05782

work page arXiv

[17] [17]

Ginzburg, B.Z

V.L. Ginzburg, B.Z. G¨ urel. Non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics on closed symplectic manifolds . Compos. Math., 152 (2016), 1777-1799

work page 2016

[18] [18]

Hofer, D

H. Hofer, D. Salamon. Floer homology and Novikov rings . The Floer Memorial Volume pp483- 524

work page

[19] [19]

Hofer, E

H. Hofer, E. Zehnder. Symplectic invariants and Hamiltonian dynamics . Birkh¨ auser, 1994

work page 1994

[20] [20]

G. Liu, G. Tian. Floer homology and Arnold conjecture . J. Diﬀerential Geometry 49 (1998), 1-74

work page 1998

[21] [21]

M. Markl. Ideal perturbation lemma . Comm. Algebra, 29(11):5209-5232, 2001

work page 2001

[22] [22]

K. Ono. On the Arnold conjecture for weakly monotone symplectic man ifolds. Invent. math. 119, 519-537 (1995)

work page 1995

[23] [23]

R. Orita. On the existence of inﬁnitely many non-contractible period ic orbits of Hamiltonian diﬀeomorphisms of closed symplectic manifolds . to appear in J. Symplectic Geom

work page

[24] [24]

R. Orita. Non-contractible periodic orbits in Hamiltonian dynamics on tori . Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 49(4):571-580, 2017

work page 2017

[25] [25]

Salamon, E

D. Salamon, E. Zehnder. Morse thoery for periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems and the Maslov index . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (1992), 1303-1360

work page 1992

[26] [26]

Seidel The equivariant pair-of-pants product in ﬁxed point Floer c ohomology

P. Seidel The equivariant pair-of-pants product in ﬁxed point Floer c ohomology. Geom. Funct. Annal. Vol. 25 (2015), 942-1007

work page 2015

[27] [27]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture . arXiv:1905.04769

work page arXiv 1905

[28] [28]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. Pseudo-rotations and Steenrod squares. Journal of Modern Dynamics, to appear

work page

[29] [29]

Shelukhin

E. Shelukhin. Pseudo-rotations and Steenrod squares revisited . Mathematical Research Let- ters, accepted

work page

[30] [30]

Shelukhin, J

E. Shelukhin, J. Zhao. The Z/pZ-equivariant product-isomorphism in ﬁxed point Floer coho - mology. Journal of Symplectic Geometry, accepted

work page