REVIEW 1 cited by
Simutaneously vanishing higher derived limits without large cardinals
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
A question dating to Sibe Marde\v{s}i\'{c} and Andrei Prasolov's 1988 work Strong homology is not additive, and motivating a considerable amount of set theoretic work in the ensuing years, is that of whether it is consistent with the ZFC axioms for the higher derived limits $\mathrm{lim}^n$ $(n>0)$ of a certain inverse system $\mathbf{A}$ indexed by ${^\omega}\omega$ to simultaneously vanish. An equivalent formulation of this question is that of whether it is consistent for all $n$-coherent families of functions indexed by ${^\omega}\omega$ to be trivial. In this paper, we prove that, in any forcing extension given by adjoining $\beth_\omega$-many Cohen reals, $\mathrm{lim}^n \mathbf{A}$ vanishes for all $n > 0$. Our proof involves a detailed combinatorial analysis of the forcing extension and repeated applications of higher dimensional $\Delta$-system lemmas. This work removes all large cardinal hypotheses from the main result of arXiv:1907.11744 and substantially reduces the least value of the continuum known to be compatible with the simultaneous vanishing of $\mathrm{lim}^n \mathbf{A}$ for all $n > 0$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Merging $\lim^1 \mathbf{A} \ne 0$ with other nonvanishing constructions
It is consistent that b=d=ω_n and lim^k A ≠ 0 for all 1≤k≤n, and that b=d=ω_{ω+2} with lim^k A ≠ 0 for every k≥1, by new forcings for lim^1 A ≠ 0 compatible with prior nonvanishing methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.