Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On a notion of ring groupoid

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.07090 v1 pith:4CTARYHT submitted 2021-04-14 math.CT math.AGmath.ATmath.NTmath.RT

classification math.CTmath.AGmath.ATmath.NTmath.RT
keywords ringanimatedgroupoidnotewithoutapproachbhatt-luriecategory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

By a ring groupoid we mean an animated ring whose i-th homotopy groups are zero for all i>1. In this expository note we give an elementary treatment of the (2,1)-category of ring groupoids (i.e., without referring to general animated rings and without using n-categories for n>2). The note is motivated by the fact that ring stacks play a central role in the Bhatt-Lurie approach to prismatic cohomology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sheared displays and $p$-divisible groups

    math.NT 2026-01 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Over p-nilpotent rings, p-divisible groups are equivalent to sheared displays, resolving Drinfeld's conjecture and giving a Dieudonné theory for all p-divisible groups.

  2. Ring stacks conjecturally related to the stacks $BT_n^{G,\mu}$

    math.AG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper defines the ring stacks sRn and sR⊕n from the ring space of sheared Witt vectors and builds several explicit quasi-isomorphic models for them.

  3. An integral comparison of crystalline and de Rham cohomology

    math.NT 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proves an integral, coefficient-version of the Berthelot-Ogus comparison between de Rham and crystalline cohomology using stacky prismatic cohomology and a Dwork-trick argument.

Pith tools