REVIEW 1 cited by
Dominance Solvability in Random Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the effectiveness of iterated elimination of strictly-dominated actions in random games. We show that dominance solvability of games is vanishingly small as the number of at least one player's actions grows. Furthermore, conditional on dominance solvability, the number of iterations required to converge to Nash equilibrium grows rapidly as action sets grow. Nonetheless, when games are highly imbalanced, iterated elimination simplifies the game substantially by ruling out a sizable fraction of actions. Technically, we illustrate the usefulness of recent combinatorial methods for the analysis of general games.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Game connectivity and adaptive dynamics in many-action games
For fixed n≥3, the large-k connected fraction of generic games with a pure Nash equilibrium is asymptotically 1−ζ_n, with ζ_n explicit and tending to 0 rapidly in n.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.