REVIEW 2 cited by
Sharper bounds for the error term in the Prime Number Theorem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We provide very effective methods to convert both asymptotic and explicit numeric bounds on the prime counting function $\psi(x)$ to bounds of the same type on both $\theta(x)$ and $\pi(x)$. This follows up our previous work on $\psi(x)$ in \cite{FKS}, and prove that $ | \pi(x) - \mathrm{Li}(x) | \leq 9.2211\, x\sqrt{\log(x)} \exp \big( -0.8476 \sqrt{\log(x)} \big) $ for all $x\ge 2$. Additionally, we are able to obtain the best numeric bounds for $x$ on a very large interval (all $x$ up to $\exp(1.8\cdot10^9)$).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An effective version of Chebotarev's density theorem
A fully explicit refinement of Lagarias and Odlyzko's effective Chebotarev theorem for all non-rational number fields, with a sharper error term for small-degree extensions.
-
The n-th prime exponentially
Known bounds on |π(x) − Li(x)| imply p_n lies between Li⁻¹(n(1 − a f(n ln n))) and Li⁻¹(n(1 + a f(n ln n))), but the stated n* is too small for large-a bounds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.