Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hubble Constant Measurement from Three Large-Separation Quasars Strongly Lensed by Galaxy Clusters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11240 v3 pith:TJS75HW7 submitted 2023-01-26 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords sdsstimedelayquasarsclustersgalaxyhubblelensed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Tension between cosmic microwave background-based and distance ladder-based determinations of the Hubble constant ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$ motivates pursuit of independent methods that are not subject to the same systematic effects. A promising alternative, proposed by Refsdal in 1964, relies on the inverse scaling of ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$ with the delay between the arrival times of at least two images of a strongly-lensed variable source such as a quasar. To date, Refsdal's method has mostly been applied to quasars lensed by individual galaxies rather than by galaxy clusters. Using the three quasars strongly lensed by galaxy clusters (SDSS J1004+4112, SDSS J1029+2623, and SDSS J2222+2745) that have both multiband Hubble Space Telescope data and published time delay measurements, we derive ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$, accounting for the systematic and statistical sources of uncertainty. While a single time delay measurement does not yield a well-constrained ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$ value, analyzing the systems together tightens the constraint. Combining the six time delays measured in the three cluster-lensed quasars gives ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$ = 74.1 $\pm$ 8.0 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. To reach 1$\%$ uncertainty in ${\rm H}_{\rm 0}$, we estimate that a sample size of order of 620 time delay measurements of similar quality as those from SDSS J1004+4112, SDSS J1029+2623, and SDSS J2222+2745 would be needed. Improving the lens modeling uncertainties by a factor of two and a half may reduce the needed sample size to 100 time delays, potentially reachable in the next decade.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Jackknife method as a new approach to validate strong lens mass models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A leave-one-source-out Jackknife cross-validation distinguishes accurate from overfitted strong lens mass models in cases where the reduced chi-square cannot.

Pith tools