pith. sign in

arxiv: 2304.04763 · v2 · pith:YSL6OCRAnew · submitted 2023-04-09 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Distributed Estimation with Decentralized Control for Quadruple-Tank Process

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords controlestimationdecentralizeddistributedphasestatecommunicationframework
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper presents a unified modeling, control, and estimation framework for the quadruple-tank process, a benchmark multivariable system that exhibits either minimum phase or nonminimum phase behavior depending on valve flow ratios. A decentralized PI control strategy is employed to regulate water levels, while a distributed state estimation scheme is developed using local Luenberger observers and inter-agent communication. Each observer uses only local output measurements and exchanges information with neighboring nodes over a strongly connected communication graph. To address the limitations of partial observability, the observer design incorporates an observability decomposition and consensus-based coupling that ensures convergence to the true system state. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, demonstrating accurate state reconstruction and stable closed loop performance under both minimum-phase and nonminimum phase configurations. These results highlight the potential of combining decentralized control with distributed estimation for scalable, networked control of complex multivariable systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Comparison of Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Control for Linear Systems under Packet Loss and Uncertainty

    eess.SY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Numerical comparison finds adaptive quantized control more robust than DDPG under packet loss and dynamic switching for uncertain linear systems, while DDPG excels in nominal conditions.