Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Sustainability Strategy for the Cool Copper Collider

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.04084 v2 pith:DXCWJSQK submitted 2023-07-09 hep-ex physics.acc-ph

classification hep-exphysics.acc-ph
keywords carboncolliderhiggsconstructioncoolcopperimpactproposals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The particle physics community has agreed that an electron-positron collider is the next step for continued progress in this field, giving a unique opportunity for a detailed study of the Higgs boson. Several proposals are currently under evaluation of the international community. Any large particle accelerator will be an energy consumer and so, today, we must be concerned about its impact on the environment. This paper evaluates the carbon impact of the construction and operations of one of these Higgs factory proposals, the Cool Copper Collider. It introduces several strategies to lower the carbon impact of the accelerator. It proposes a metric to compare the carbon costs of Higgs factories, balancing physics reach, energy needs, and carbon footprint for both construction and operations, and compares the various Higgs factory proposals within this framework. For the Cool Copper Collider, the compact 8 km footprint and the possibility for cut-and-cover construction greatly reduce the dominant contribution from embodied carbon.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comment on "Sustainability Strategy for the Cool Copper Collider", arXiv:2307.04084

    hep-ex 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The sustainability metric used in the Cool Copper Collider comparison is shown to be arithmetically wrong and mathematically ill behaved, making its rankings unreliable.

  2. Probing Lepton Number Violation at Same-Sign Lepton Colliders

    hep-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A same-sign mu+ mu+ collider at 250 GeV to 1 TeV could discover or constrain lepton-number-violating signals from heavy neutral leptons and neutrinophilic scalars beyond existing experiments.

  3. Higgs Factory options for CERN: A comparative study

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For equal Higgs coupling precision, FCC-ee is estimated to be about six times faster and four to five times less electricity-intensive than CLIC or ILC@CERN.

Pith tools