Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

21cm Intensity Mapping cross-correlation with galaxy surveys: current and forecasted cosmological parameters estimation for the SKAO

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.00710 v2 pith:RHO2X3N6 submitted 2023-09-01 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cross-correlationdatasignalclusteringgalaxyparametersconstraintscosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a comprehensive set of forecasts for the cross-correlation signal between 21cm intensity mapping and galaxy redshift surveys. We focus on the data sets that will be provided by the SKAO for the 21cm signal, DESI and Euclid for galaxy clustering. We build a likelihood which takes into account the effect of the beam for the radio observations, the Alcock-Paczynski effect, a simple parameterization of astrophysical nuisances, and fully exploit the tomographic power of such observations in the range $z=0.7-1.8$ at linear and mildly non-linear scales ($k<0.25 h/$Mpc). The forecasted constraints, obtained with Monte Carlo Markov Chains techniques in a Bayesian framework, in terms of the six base parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, are promising. The predicted signal-to-noise ratio for the cross-correlation can reach $\sim 50$ for $z\sim 1$ and $k\sim 0.1 h/$ Mpc. When the cross-correlation signal is combined with current Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from Planck, the error bar on $\Omega_{\rm c}\,h^2$ and $H_0$ is reduced by a factor 3 and 6, respectively, compared to CMB only data, due to the measurement of matter clustering provided by the two observables. The cross-correlation signal has a constraining power that is comparable to the auto-correlation one and combining all the clustering measurements a sub-percent error bar of 0.33% on $H_0$ can be achieved, which is about a factor 2 better than CMB only measurement. Finally, as a proof-of-concept, we test the full pipeline on the real data measured by the MeerKat collaboration (Cunnington et al. 2022) presenting some (weak) constraints on cosmological parameters.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Restoration of contaminated data in an Intensity Mapping survey using deep neural networks

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Restoring RFI-contaminated pixels with the LaMa inpainting network reduces post-foreground-removal RMS and improves recovery of the large-scale 21-cm power spectrum in simulations.

  2. Cosmology with HI Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    SKAO HI intensity mapping forecasts yield competitive LambdaCDM constraints (e.g. H0 to ~0.3 km/s/Mpc optimistic) via power spectrum, BAO, bispectrum and stacking, complementary to CMB and optical surveys.

Pith tools