Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.11690 v3 pith:NOHS5KGJ submitted 2023-09-20 econ.GN q-fin.EC

classification econ.GNq-fin.EC
keywords automationgrowtheconomiclaborargumentsbottlenecksexplosiveforce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine whether substantial AI automation could accelerate global economic growth by about an order of magnitude, akin to the economic growth effects of the Industrial Revolution. We identify three primary drivers for such growth: 1) the scalability of an AI "labor force" restoring a regime of increasing returns to scale, 2) the rapid expansion of an AI labor force, and 3) a massive increase in output from rapid automation occurring over a brief period of time. Against this backdrop, we evaluate nine counterarguments, including regulatory hurdles, production bottlenecks, alignment issues, and the pace of automation. We tentatively assess these arguments, finding most are unlikely deciders. We conclude that explosive growth seems plausible with AI capable of broadly substituting for human labor, but high confidence in this claim seems currently unwarranted. Key questions remain about the intensity of regulatory responses to AI, physical bottlenecks in production, the economic value of superhuman abilities, and the rate at which AI automation could occur.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a randomized trial of 246 real open-source tasks, experienced developers took 19% longer when AI tools were allowed, despite forecasting 24% faster completion.

  2. RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AI agents beat human ML experts on short (2-hour) research-engineering tasks, but human experts outperform agents given 8+ hour budgets, measured on seven new open-source RE-Bench environments.

  3. When Do AI Gains Become Broadly Shareable? A Policy Threshold for AI-Driven Automation

    econ.GN 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Solow-Zeira model with an AI capability parameter yields a closed-form threshold: AI must reach about 5-7x pre-AI automation productivity to fund an 11%-of-GDP UBI under current U.S. parameters.

Pith tools